Abstract
The standard philosophical definition of placebos offered by Grünbaum is incompatible with Cartwright’s conception of randomized clinical trials. I offer a modified account of placebos that respects this role and clarifies why many current medical trials fail to warrant the conclusions they are typically seen as yielding. I then consider recent changes to guidelines for reporting medical trials and show that pessimism over parsing out the cause of “unblinding” is premature. Specifically, using a trial of antidepressants, I show how more sophisticated statistical analyses can parse out the source of such effects and serve as an alternative to placebo control.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1330-1343 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Philosophy of Science |
Volume | 82 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 Dec |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science