TY - JOUR
T1 - Who becomes a civil servant? Evidence from a decade of youth panel analysis
AU - Lee, Don S.
AU - Chung, Kee Hoon
AU - Rhee, Inbok
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - This article explores the patterns of bureaucratic recruitment—focusing on who prepares for and passes the civil service examination—using unique panel data that capture and track career aspirations, socioeconomic backgrounds, and actual career trajectories of tens of thousands of Korean youth for 12 years. Our analysis shows that those who are better educated, prosocial, and well-off are positively correlated with the likelihood of preparing for the examination. Moreover, we find that, contrary to some worries, the likelihood of passing the examination is positively correlated with talented and prosocial candidates with no strong connection to more affluent family backgrounds.
AB - This article explores the patterns of bureaucratic recruitment—focusing on who prepares for and passes the civil service examination—using unique panel data that capture and track career aspirations, socioeconomic backgrounds, and actual career trajectories of tens of thousands of Korean youth for 12 years. Our analysis shows that those who are better educated, prosocial, and well-off are positively correlated with the likelihood of preparing for the examination. Moreover, we find that, contrary to some worries, the likelihood of passing the examination is positively correlated with talented and prosocial candidates with no strong connection to more affluent family backgrounds.
KW - Meritocracy
KW - bureaucratic recruitment
KW - civil service examination
KW - prosociality
KW - representation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85188597528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85188597528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14719037.2024.2327616
DO - 10.1080/14719037.2024.2327616
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85188597528
SN - 1471-9037
JO - Public Management Review
JF - Public Management Review
ER -