Abstract
Polarization is a topic of intense interest among social scientists, but there is significant disagreement regarding the character of the phenomenon and little understanding of underlying mechanics. A first problem, we argue, is that polarization appears in the literature as not one concept but many. In the first part of the article, we distinguish nine phenomena that may be considered polarization, with suggestions of appropriate measures for each. In the second part of the article, we apply this analysis to evaluate the types of polarization generated by the three major families of computational models proposing specific mechanisms of opinion polarization.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 115-159 |
Number of pages | 45 |
Journal | Philosophy of Science |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 Jan |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science