TY - JOUR
T1 - Ultrasonography-Based Radiomics of Screening-Detected Ductal Carcinoma In Situ According to Visibility on Mammography
AU - Koh, Jieun
AU - Lee, Eunjung
AU - Han, Kyunghwa
AU - Lee, Young Han
AU - Kwak, Jin Young
AU - Yoon, Jung Hyun
AU - Moon, Hee Jung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/3/13
Y1 - 2021/3/13
N2 - Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has different prognostic factors according to the detection modality. The purpose of this study was to compare parameters from a radiomic analysis of ultrasonography (US) images for DCIS detected on screening mammography (MMG) and US and detected on screening US only. A total of 154 surgically confirmed DCIS visible on US were included. Regions of interest were drawn onto US images of DCIS, and texture analysis was performed. Lesions were classified into those detected by both US and MMG (the US-MMG group) and those detected by US only (the US group). Analysis parameters were compared between the US-MMG group and the US group. Ninety-six lesions were included in the US-MMG group and 58 lesions in the US group. Energy, entropy, maximum, mean absolute deviation, range, SD, and variance were significantly higher in the US-MMG group than the US group. Kurtosis, skewness, and uniformity were significantly lower in the US-MMG group than the US group. Among the 22 gray-level cooccurrence matrix parameters, 18, 21, 22, 20, and 21 parameters were significantly different between the 2 groups in 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees and the average value. Among the 11 gray-level run-length matrix parameters, 6, 6, 7, 7, and 6 parameters were significantly different in 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees and the average value. Inverse variance and gray-level nonuniformity were the most different features between the 2 groups. Screening-detected DCIS showed different radiomic features according to the detection modality.
AB - Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has different prognostic factors according to the detection modality. The purpose of this study was to compare parameters from a radiomic analysis of ultrasonography (US) images for DCIS detected on screening mammography (MMG) and US and detected on screening US only. A total of 154 surgically confirmed DCIS visible on US were included. Regions of interest were drawn onto US images of DCIS, and texture analysis was performed. Lesions were classified into those detected by both US and MMG (the US-MMG group) and those detected by US only (the US group). Analysis parameters were compared between the US-MMG group and the US group. Ninety-six lesions were included in the US-MMG group and 58 lesions in the US group. Energy, entropy, maximum, mean absolute deviation, range, SD, and variance were significantly higher in the US-MMG group than the US group. Kurtosis, skewness, and uniformity were significantly lower in the US-MMG group than the US group. Among the 22 gray-level cooccurrence matrix parameters, 18, 21, 22, 20, and 21 parameters were significantly different between the 2 groups in 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees and the average value. Among the 11 gray-level run-length matrix parameters, 6, 6, 7, 7, and 6 parameters were significantly different in 0, 45, 90, and 135 degrees and the average value. Inverse variance and gray-level nonuniformity were the most different features between the 2 groups. Screening-detected DCIS showed different radiomic features according to the detection modality.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102608330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102608330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000538
DO - 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000538
M3 - Article
C2 - 33186269
AN - SCOPUS:85102608330
SN - 0894-8771
VL - 37
SP - 23
EP - 27
JO - Ultrasound Quarterly
JF - Ultrasound Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -