TY - JOUR
T1 - Two-year clinical outcome of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction
T2 - insights from the prospective KAMIR-NIH Registry
AU - KAMIR-NIH Registry Investigators
AU - Jeon, Ho Sung
AU - Lee, Jun Won
AU - Moon, Jin Sil
AU - Kang, Dae Ryong
AU - Lee, Jung Hee
AU - Youn, Young Jin
AU - Ahn, Min Soo
AU - Ahn, Sung Gyun
AU - Yoo, Byung Su
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
2024 Jeon, Lee, Moon, Kang, Lee, Youn, Ahn, Ahn and Yoo.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a crucial prognostic indicator of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is a lack of studies on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF) after AMI. Methods: We categorized 6,553 patients with AMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and December 2015 into three groups based on their EF, as assessed by echocardiography during index hospitalization: reduced EF (LVEF ≤40%), mildly reduced EF (LVEF 41%–49%), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥50%). The primary outcome was all-cause death within 2 years. The secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, any MI, or revascularization. Results: Of the total 6,553 patients, 884 (13.5%) were classified into the reduced EF group, 1,749 (26.7%) into the mildly reduced EF group, and 3,920 (59.8%) into the preserved EF group. Patients with mildly reduced EF exhibited intermediate mortality (reduced EF, 24.7%; mildly reduced EF, 8.3%; preserved EF, 4.6%; p < 0.0001), MI (3.9% vs. 2.7% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0046), and POCE (33.0% vs. 15.6% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001) rates, albeit closer to those of the preserved EF. After adjustment for demographics, risk factors, admission status, and discharge medications, patients with mildly reduced EF showed a lower risk of all-cause death than those with reduced EF (mildly reduced EF group as a reference: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.40–2.18; p < 0.001), but it did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75–1.18; p = 0.999) Conclusions: Over a 2-year follow-up period, patients with AMI and mildly reduced EF demonstrated better prognoses than those with reduced EF, but did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF. Clinical Trial Registration: cris.nih.go.kr, identifier: KCT−0000863.
AB - Background: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a crucial prognostic indicator of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is a lack of studies on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF) after AMI. Methods: We categorized 6,553 patients with AMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and December 2015 into three groups based on their EF, as assessed by echocardiography during index hospitalization: reduced EF (LVEF ≤40%), mildly reduced EF (LVEF 41%–49%), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥50%). The primary outcome was all-cause death within 2 years. The secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, any MI, or revascularization. Results: Of the total 6,553 patients, 884 (13.5%) were classified into the reduced EF group, 1,749 (26.7%) into the mildly reduced EF group, and 3,920 (59.8%) into the preserved EF group. Patients with mildly reduced EF exhibited intermediate mortality (reduced EF, 24.7%; mildly reduced EF, 8.3%; preserved EF, 4.6%; p < 0.0001), MI (3.9% vs. 2.7% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0046), and POCE (33.0% vs. 15.6% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001) rates, albeit closer to those of the preserved EF. After adjustment for demographics, risk factors, admission status, and discharge medications, patients with mildly reduced EF showed a lower risk of all-cause death than those with reduced EF (mildly reduced EF group as a reference: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.40–2.18; p < 0.001), but it did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75–1.18; p = 0.999) Conclusions: Over a 2-year follow-up period, patients with AMI and mildly reduced EF demonstrated better prognoses than those with reduced EF, but did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF. Clinical Trial Registration: cris.nih.go.kr, identifier: KCT−0000863.
KW - acute myocardial infarction
KW - left ventricular ejection fraction
KW - mildly reduced ejection fraction
KW - prognosis
KW - prospective registry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205987610&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205987610&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1458740
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1458740
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85205987610
SN - 2297-055X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
M1 - 1458740
ER -