TY - JOUR
T1 - Theta oscillation related to the auditory discrimination process in mismatch negativity
T2 - Oddball versus control paradigm
AU - Ko, Deokwon
AU - Kwon, Soyoung
AU - Lee, Gwan Taek
AU - Im, Chang Hwan
AU - Kim, Kyung Hwan
AU - Jung, Ki Young
PY - 2012/3
Y1 - 2012/3
N2 - Background and Purpose he aim of this study was to identify the mechanism underlying the auditory discriminatory process reflected in mismatch negativity (MMN), using time-frequency analysis of single-trial event-related potentials (ERPs). Methods Two auditory tones of different probabilities (oddball paradigm) and the same probability (control paradigm) were used. The average dynamic changes in amplitude were evaluated, and the in-phase consistency of the EEG spectrum at each frequency and time window across trials, event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), and inter-trial phase coherence (ITC) were computed. Results Subtraction of the ERPs of standard stimuli from the ERPs of deviant stimuli revealed a clear MMN component in the oddball paradigm. However, no discernible MMN component was observed in the control paradigm. Statistical tests showed that in the oddball paradigm, deviant tones produced significant increases of theta ERSPs and ITC at around 250 ms as compared with the standard tone, while no significant difference between the two stimuli was observed in the control paradigm. Conclusions Our results confirm that the auditory discriminatory process reflected in MMN is accompanied by phase resetting and power modulation at the theta frequency.
AB - Background and Purpose he aim of this study was to identify the mechanism underlying the auditory discriminatory process reflected in mismatch negativity (MMN), using time-frequency analysis of single-trial event-related potentials (ERPs). Methods Two auditory tones of different probabilities (oddball paradigm) and the same probability (control paradigm) were used. The average dynamic changes in amplitude were evaluated, and the in-phase consistency of the EEG spectrum at each frequency and time window across trials, event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), and inter-trial phase coherence (ITC) were computed. Results Subtraction of the ERPs of standard stimuli from the ERPs of deviant stimuli revealed a clear MMN component in the oddball paradigm. However, no discernible MMN component was observed in the control paradigm. Statistical tests showed that in the oddball paradigm, deviant tones produced significant increases of theta ERSPs and ITC at around 250 ms as compared with the standard tone, while no significant difference between the two stimuli was observed in the control paradigm. Conclusions Our results confirm that the auditory discriminatory process reflected in MMN is accompanied by phase resetting and power modulation at the theta frequency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930480824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930480824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.1.35
DO - 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.1.35
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84930480824
SN - 1738-6586
VL - 8
SP - 35
EP - 42
JO - Journal of Clinical Neurology (Korea)
JF - Journal of Clinical Neurology (Korea)
IS - 1
ER -