The immigrant paradox: Immigrants are less antisocial than native-born Americans

Michael G. Vaughn, Christopher P. Salas-Wright, Matt Delisi, Brandy R. Maynard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)


Purpose: Although recent research on crime and violence among immigrants suggests a paradox - where immigrants are more socially disadvantaged yet less likely to commit crime - previous research is limited by issues of generalizability and assessment of the full depth of antisocial behavior. Methods: We surmount these limitations using data from waves I and II of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) and compare immigrants (N = 7,320) from Asia, Africa, Europe, and Latin America to native-born Americans (N = 34,622) with respect to violent and nonviolent forms of antisocial behavior. Results: After controlling for an extensive array of confounds, results indicate that immigrants are significantly less antisocial despite being more likely to have lower levels of income, less education, and reside in urban areas. These findings hold for immigrants from major regions of the world including Africa, Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Conclusions: This study confirms and extends prior research on crime and antisocial behavior, but suggests that it is premature however to think of immigrants as a policy intervention for treating high crime areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1129-1137
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jul

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Epidemiology
  • Health(social science)
  • Social Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'The immigrant paradox: Immigrants are less antisocial than native-born Americans'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this