TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of five mechanical instrumentation protocols on implant surface topography and roughness
T2 - A scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscope analysis
AU - Cha, Jae Kook
AU - Paeng, Kyeongwon
AU - Jung, Ui Won
AU - Choi, Seong Ho
AU - Sanz, Mariano
AU - Sanz-Martín, Ignacio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Objective: To evaluate in vitro the changes in implant surface topography and roughness of commercial implants after instrumentation with five decontamination protocols. Material and methods: Seventy-two titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface were placed 5 mm supra-crestally. Five groups of twelve implants were instrumented with the following protocols: a metal scaler tip (SCAL), a thermoplastic scaler tip (PEEK), a round titanium brush (RBRU), a tufted brush with titanium bristles (TNBRU), and a glycine-based air-powder abrasive (GLYC). A sixth group with untreated implants was used as control. Scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscope were utilized to evaluate the changes in the implant surfaces. Results: The SCAL caused pronounced macroscopic alterations and damage of the implant surface, the PEEK left remnants of the plastic tip in the implant surface, and both titanium brush groups flattened the thread profile, while minimal alterations were observed in the GLYC. When compared to the control group, the roughness parameters (Sa) in the buccal aspect increased in the thread area of SCAL, and a minor reduction was observed in the PEEK while in the other groups, these values remained unchanged. In the valley areas, however the RBRU, TNBRU, and GLYC experienced a significant reduction (smoothening) indicating different accessibility of the decontamination protocols to the thread and valley. Similarly, the buccal aspects had more pronounced changes than those in the palatal aspect. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro investigation, the tested protocols induced different macroscopic alterations and surface roughness changes that varied in the thread and valley area.
AB - Objective: To evaluate in vitro the changes in implant surface topography and roughness of commercial implants after instrumentation with five decontamination protocols. Material and methods: Seventy-two titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface were placed 5 mm supra-crestally. Five groups of twelve implants were instrumented with the following protocols: a metal scaler tip (SCAL), a thermoplastic scaler tip (PEEK), a round titanium brush (RBRU), a tufted brush with titanium bristles (TNBRU), and a glycine-based air-powder abrasive (GLYC). A sixth group with untreated implants was used as control. Scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscope were utilized to evaluate the changes in the implant surfaces. Results: The SCAL caused pronounced macroscopic alterations and damage of the implant surface, the PEEK left remnants of the plastic tip in the implant surface, and both titanium brush groups flattened the thread profile, while minimal alterations were observed in the GLYC. When compared to the control group, the roughness parameters (Sa) in the buccal aspect increased in the thread area of SCAL, and a minor reduction was observed in the PEEK while in the other groups, these values remained unchanged. In the valley areas, however the RBRU, TNBRU, and GLYC experienced a significant reduction (smoothening) indicating different accessibility of the decontamination protocols to the thread and valley. Similarly, the buccal aspects had more pronounced changes than those in the palatal aspect. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro investigation, the tested protocols induced different macroscopic alterations and surface roughness changes that varied in the thread and valley area.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065424530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065424530&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/clr.13446
DO - 10.1111/clr.13446
M3 - Article
C2 - 31022305
AN - SCOPUS:85065424530
SN - 0905-7161
VL - 30
SP - 578
EP - 587
JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research
JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research
IS - 6
ER -