TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of 0.9% saline versus plasmalyte on coagulation in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery; a randomized controlled trial
AU - Song, Jong Wook
AU - Shim, Jae Kwang
AU - Kim, Na Young
AU - Jang, Jaewon
AU - Kwak, Young Lan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited.
PY - 2015/8/1
Y1 - 2015/8/1
N2 - Introduction: In multi-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery yielding a large amount of blood loss, choice of fluid for volume resuscitation is an important issue since it can influence acid-base status, coagulation, and patients' outcome. This study compared the effect of plasmalyte to 0.9% saline on coagulation assessed by rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and acid-base balance in the aforementioned patients. Methods: Fifty patients were randomly allocated to receive either 0.9% saline or plasmalyte during operation and until postoperative 12 h. ROTEM was performed at 10 min after anesthetic induction and end of surgery. Arterial blood gas analyses were serially performed from 10 min after anesthetic induction until postoperative 12 h. Fluid balance, blood loss, and transfusion requirement were assessed. Results: ROTEM variables showed sporadic deterioration in both groups after surgery without intergroup differences. Intraoperatively, arterial pH, base excess, and bicarbonate concentrations were lower and serum chloride concentrations were higher in the 0.9% saline group compared with the plasmalyte group. The differences in base excess and bicarbonate concentrations persisted until postoperative 12 h. Fluid balance, blood loss, and transfusion requirement were similar between the groups while urine output was greater in the plasmalyte group compared with the 0.9% saline group (3.2 ± 1.6 ml/kg/h vs. 1.8 ± 1.1 ml/kg/h, p = 0.001). Conclusion: In contrast to plasmalyte, fluid therapy with 0.9% saline resulted in transient hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing multi-level lumbar spinal fusion, while coagulation assessed by ROTEM analysis and the amount of blood loss were similar between the groups.
AB - Introduction: In multi-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery yielding a large amount of blood loss, choice of fluid for volume resuscitation is an important issue since it can influence acid-base status, coagulation, and patients' outcome. This study compared the effect of plasmalyte to 0.9% saline on coagulation assessed by rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and acid-base balance in the aforementioned patients. Methods: Fifty patients were randomly allocated to receive either 0.9% saline or plasmalyte during operation and until postoperative 12 h. ROTEM was performed at 10 min after anesthetic induction and end of surgery. Arterial blood gas analyses were serially performed from 10 min after anesthetic induction until postoperative 12 h. Fluid balance, blood loss, and transfusion requirement were assessed. Results: ROTEM variables showed sporadic deterioration in both groups after surgery without intergroup differences. Intraoperatively, arterial pH, base excess, and bicarbonate concentrations were lower and serum chloride concentrations were higher in the 0.9% saline group compared with the plasmalyte group. The differences in base excess and bicarbonate concentrations persisted until postoperative 12 h. Fluid balance, blood loss, and transfusion requirement were similar between the groups while urine output was greater in the plasmalyte group compared with the 0.9% saline group (3.2 ± 1.6 ml/kg/h vs. 1.8 ± 1.1 ml/kg/h, p = 0.001). Conclusion: In contrast to plasmalyte, fluid therapy with 0.9% saline resulted in transient hyperchloremic acidosis in patients undergoing multi-level lumbar spinal fusion, while coagulation assessed by ROTEM analysis and the amount of blood loss were similar between the groups.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938802050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938802050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.065
DO - 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.065
M3 - Article
C2 - 26123384
AN - SCOPUS:84938802050
SN - 1743-9191
VL - 20
SP - 128
EP - 134
JO - International Journal of Surgery
JF - International Journal of Surgery
ER -