TY - JOUR
T1 - The accuracy of ultrasonography for the evaluation of portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Kim, Gaeun
AU - Cho, Youn Zoo
AU - Baik, Soon Koo
AU - Kim, Moon Young
AU - Hong, Won Ki
AU - Kwon, Sang Ok
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Korean Society of Radiology.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Objective: Studies have presented conflicting results regarding the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for diagnosing portal hypertension (PH). We sought to identify evidence in the literature regarding the accuracy of US for assessing PH in patients with liver cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review by searching databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for relevant studies. Results: A total of 14 studies met our inclusion criteria. The US indices were obtained in the portal vein (n = 9), hepatic artery (n = 6), hepatic vein (HV) (n = 4) and other vessels. Using hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) as the reference, the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the portal venous indices were 69–88% and 67–75%, respectively. The correlation coefficients between HVPG and the portal venous indices were approximately 0.296–0.8. No studies assess the Se and Sp of the hepatic arterial indices. The correlation between HVPG and the hepatic arterial indices ranged from 0.01 to 0.83. The Se and Sp of the hepatic venous indices were 75.9–77.8% and 81.8–100%, respectively. In particular, the Se and Sp of HV arrival time for clinically significant PH were 92.7% and 86.7%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation between HVPG and the hepatic venous indices was observed (0.545–0.649). Conclusion: Some US indices, such as HV, exhibited an increased accuracy for diagnosing PH. These indices may be useful in clinical practice for the detection of significant PH.
AB - Objective: Studies have presented conflicting results regarding the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) for diagnosing portal hypertension (PH). We sought to identify evidence in the literature regarding the accuracy of US for assessing PH in patients with liver cirrhosis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review by searching databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for relevant studies. Results: A total of 14 studies met our inclusion criteria. The US indices were obtained in the portal vein (n = 9), hepatic artery (n = 6), hepatic vein (HV) (n = 4) and other vessels. Using hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) as the reference, the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the portal venous indices were 69–88% and 67–75%, respectively. The correlation coefficients between HVPG and the portal venous indices were approximately 0.296–0.8. No studies assess the Se and Sp of the hepatic arterial indices. The correlation between HVPG and the hepatic arterial indices ranged from 0.01 to 0.83. The Se and Sp of the hepatic venous indices were 75.9–77.8% and 81.8–100%, respectively. In particular, the Se and Sp of HV arrival time for clinically significant PH were 92.7% and 86.7%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation between HVPG and the hepatic venous indices was observed (0.545–0.649). Conclusion: Some US indices, such as HV, exhibited an increased accuracy for diagnosing PH. These indices may be useful in clinical practice for the detection of significant PH.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923861132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923861132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.314
DO - 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.314
M3 - Article
C2 - 25741193
AN - SCOPUS:84923861132
SN - 1229-6929
VL - 16
SP - 314
EP - 324
JO - Korean journal of radiology
JF - Korean journal of radiology
IS - 2
ER -