Strategies to improve treatment outcome in gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis of patients from two high-volume hospitals in Korea and China

Kun Yang, Yoon Young Choi, Wei Han Zhang, Xin Zu Chen, Mi Kyung Song, Jinae Lee, Bo Zhang, Zhi Xin Chen, Hyoung Il Kim, Jia Ping Chen, Jae Ho Cheong, Zong Guang Zhou, Woo Jin Hyung, Jian Kun Hu, Sung Hoon Noh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)


China has high incidence of gastric cancer (GC). However, the treatment outcomes of China were unsatisfactory compared to those of Korea. We performed this study to compare tumour characteristics, treatment parameters, and survival outcomes of GC patients between Korea and China based on the databases of two high-volume hospitals, with the aim of identifying indicators of GC prognosis. Data of patients undergoing gastrectomy for GC from 2006 to 2010 were analysed retrospectively. Subgroup survival analyses, stratified by clinicopathologic factors and multivariable analyses, were performed. The interactive roles of chemotherapy and D2 lymphadenectomy for overall survival were also investigated. Among 1365 Chinese and 4981 Korean patients, the proportion of early cancer detection in Chinese patients was much lower relative to that of Korean patients. There were no significant differences between countries in terms of surgical morbidity and mortality. The overall 5-year survival rates were 54.3% and 81.4%; when stratified by clinicopathologic factors, the survival were generally statistically higher in Korean patients. Gender, age, T stage, N stage, extent of lymphadenectomy, radicality of surgery, resection type, and chemotherapy were independently associated with survival in patients without metastasis. Survival rates for stage II and III GC differed significantly between the two countries, but this difference was eliminated among patients who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy or received chemotherapy. These treatments were given to patients with advancedstage diagnoses (approximately 20% and 80% of patients, respectively). Treatment type was selected as independent prognostic factors in stage I-III and D2/D2+, with chemotherapy resulting in the best prognosis. Many differences in GC tumour characteristics exist between two countries. Early cancer detection and standardized treatment in Korea contribute to superior survival rates. Promotion of an early screening program, training and dissemination of standard D2 lymphadenectomy, and appropriate applications of chemotherapy would improve survival outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44660-44675
Number of pages16
Issue number28
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
(1) National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81301867, 81372344); (2) Sichuan Province Youth Science & Technology Innovative Research Team (No.2015TD0009); (3) This research was supported by a grant of the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (1020390, 1320360).

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology


Dive into the research topics of 'Strategies to improve treatment outcome in gastric cancer: A retrospective analysis of patients from two high-volume hospitals in Korea and China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this