Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sex Differences in Patient-Rated Outcomes after Lumbar Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study

  • Olga Ciobanu-Caraus
  • , Alexandra Grob
  • , Jonas Rohr
  • , Vittorio Stumpo
  • , Luca Ricciardi
  • , Nicolai Maldaner
  • , Hubert A.J. Eversdijk
  • , Moira Vieli
  • , Antonino Raco
  • , Massimo Miscusi
  • , Andrea Perna
  • , Luca Proietti
  • , Giorgio Lofrese
  • , Michele Dughiero
  • , Francesco Cultrera
  • , Marcello D'Andrea
  • , Seong B. An
  • , Yoon Ha
  • , Aymeric Amelot
  • , Jorge B. Cadelo
  • Jose M. Viñuela-Prieto, Maria L. Gandía-González, Pierre Pascal Girod, Sara Lener, Nikolaus Kögl, Anto Abramovic, Christoph J. Laux, Mazda Farshad, Dave O'Riordan, Markus Loibl, Fabio Galbusera, Anne F. Mannion, Alba Scerrati, Pasquale De Bonis, Granit Molliqaj, Enrico Tessitore, Marc L. Schröder, Martin N. Stienen, Giovanna Brandi, Luca Regli, Carlo Serra, Victor E. Staartjes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Study Design. Heterogeneous data collection through a mix of prospective, retrospective, and ambispective methods. Objective. To evaluate the effect of biological sex on patient-reported outcomes after spinal fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disease. Summary of Background Data. Current literature suggests sex differences regarding clinical outcome after spine surgery may exist. Substantial methodological heterogeneity and limited comparability of studies warrants further investigation of sex-related differences in treatment outcomes. Materials and Methods. We analyzed patients who underwent spinal fusion with or without pedicle screw insertion for lumbar degenerative disease included within a multinational study, comprising patients from 11 centers in seven countries. Absolute values and change scores (change from preoperative baseline to postoperative follow-up) for 12-month functional impairment [Oswestry disability index (ODI)] and back and leg pain severity [numeric rating scale (NRS)] were compared between male and female patients. Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was defined as >30% improvement. Results. Six-hundred sixty (59%) of 1115 included patients were female. Female patients presented with significantly baseline ODI (51.5±17.2 vs. 47.8±17.9, P<0.001), back pain (6.96±2.32 vs. 6.60±2.30, P=0.010) and leg pain (6.49±2.76 vs. 6.01±2.76, P=0.005). At 12 months, female patients still reported significantly higher ODI (22.76±16.97 vs. 20.50±16.10, P=0.025), but not higher back (3.13±2.38 vs. 3.00±2.40, P=0.355) or leg pain (2.62±2.55 vs. 2.34±2.43, P=0.060). Change scores at 12 months did not differ significantly among male and female patients in ODI (Δ1.31, 95% CI: -3.88 to 1.25, P=0.315), back (Δ0.22, 95% CI: -0.57 to 0.12, P=0.197), and leg pain (Δ0.16, 95% CI: -0.56 to 0.24, P=0.439). MCID at 12 months was achieved in 330 (77.5%) male patients and 481 (76.3%) female patients (P=0.729) for ODI. Conclusion. Both sexes experienced a similar benefit from surgery in terms of relative improvement in scores for functional impairment and pain. Although female patients reported a higher degree of functional impairment and pain preoperatively, at 12 months only their average scores for functional impairment remained higher than those for their male counterparts, while absolute pain scores were similar for female and male patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)924-931
Number of pages8
JournalSpine
Volume50
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025 Jul 1

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sex Differences in Patient-Rated Outcomes after Lumbar Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Multicenter Cohort Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this