Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Safety and Antitumor Activity of a-PD-L1 Antibody as Monotherapy or in Combination witha-TIM-3 Antibody in Patients with Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors

  • Antoine Hollebecque
  • , Hyun C. Chung
  • , Maria J.De Miguel
  • , Antoine Italiano
  • , Jean Pascal MacHiels
  • , Chia Chi Lin
  • , Neesha C. Dhani
  • , Marc Peeters
  • , Victor Moreno
  • , Wu Chou Su
  • , Kay Hoong Chow
  • , Violeta R. Galvao
  • , Michelle Carlse
  • , Danni Yu
  • , Anna M. Szpurka
  • , Yumin Zhao
  • , Shelly L. Schmidt
  • , Leena Gandhi
  • , Xiaojian Xu
  • , Yung Jue Bang

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors show high response rates and durable clinical benefit inmicrosatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) tumors. However, 50%-60% do not respond to single-agent anti-programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies, and approximately 50% of responders relapse within 6-12 months. This phase Ib trial evaluated safety and antitumor activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody LY3300054 monotherapy or in combination with anti-TIM-3 antibody LY3321367 in patients with MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients ≥18 years without prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy received LY3300054 monotherapy (N 40) or combination (N 20); patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory tumors received the combination (N 22). LY3300054 (700 mg) and anti-TIM-3 antibody (cycles 1-2: 1,200 mg, cycle 3 onward: 600 mg) were administered intravenously every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Results: Eighty-two patients were enrolled. Most had colorectal (n 39, 47.6%) or endometrial (n 14, 17.1%) tumors. More than 70% of patients in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort had received ≥3 treatment lines. Treatmentrelated adverse events (TRAE) occurred in 22 patients (55.0%) receiving monotherapy, 13 (65.0%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor- naïve combination cohort, and 6 (27.3%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort. A total of 2 patients (5.0%) receiving monotherapy and 3 (7.1%) receiving the combination experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. Objective responses occurred in 13 patients (32.5%) with monotherapy, 9 (45.0%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve combination cohort, and 1 patient (4.5%) in the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/refractory combination cohort. Conclusions: LY3300054 monotherapy and combined LY3300054/anti-TIM-3 had manageable safety profiles. Both regimens showed promising clinical activity against PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor- naïve MSI-H/dMMR tumors. The combination had limited clinical benefit in patients with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-resistant/ refractory MSI-H/dMMR tumors. _2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6393-6404
Number of pages12
JournalClinical Cancer Research
Volume27
Issue number23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021 Dec 1

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Association for Cancer Research Inc.. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and Antitumor Activity of a-PD-L1 Antibody as Monotherapy or in Combination witha-TIM-3 Antibody in Patients with Microsatellite Instability-High/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this