TY - GEN
T1 - Robust optimal experimental design for study of the human head-neck tracking response
AU - Priess, M. Cody
AU - Choi, Jongeun
AU - Crayne, Kyle
AU - Popovich, John M.
AU - Reeves, N. Peter
AU - Chalewicki, Jacek
AU - Radcliffe, Clark
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - In an effort to better understand the human head-neck target tracking response, we have developed a procedure for designing a robustly optimal experimental configuration for system identification. This configuration is comprised of a parametrized input sequence along with physical parameters for the experi-ment. We have developed both nominal and experimental models containing uncertainties for the target tracking task based on several preliminary experimental data sets, and identified a feasible population of subject controller parameters. We applied a min-max optimization scheme to minimize a performance cost over the feasible experimental configurations, while simultaneously maximizing it over the population of subject controller pa-rameters. In this way, a minimum level of design performance for any subject within the defined population can be guaranteed. We show that in the worst-case, the performance cost is 0.473 in flexion/extension, and 0.122 in axial rotation.
AB - In an effort to better understand the human head-neck target tracking response, we have developed a procedure for designing a robustly optimal experimental configuration for system identification. This configuration is comprised of a parametrized input sequence along with physical parameters for the experi-ment. We have developed both nominal and experimental models containing uncertainties for the target tracking task based on several preliminary experimental data sets, and identified a feasible population of subject controller parameters. We applied a min-max optimization scheme to minimize a performance cost over the feasible experimental configurations, while simultaneously maximizing it over the population of subject controller pa-rameters. In this way, a minimum level of design performance for any subject within the defined population can be guaranteed. We show that in the worst-case, the performance cost is 0.473 in flexion/extension, and 0.122 in axial rotation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885925914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885925914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/DSCC2012-MOVIC2012-8595
DO - 10.1115/DSCC2012-MOVIC2012-8595
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84885925914
SN - 9780791845301
T3 - ASME 2012 5th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference Joint with the JSME 2012 11th Motion and Vibration Conference, DSCC 2012-MOVIC 2012
SP - 503
EP - 510
BT - ASME 2012 5th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference Joint with the JSME 2012 11th Motion and Vibration Conference, DSCC 2012-MOVIC 2012
T2 - ASME 2012 5th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference Joint with the JSME 2012 11th Motion and Vibration Conference, DSCC 2012-MOVIC 2012
Y2 - 17 October 2012 through 19 October 2012
ER -