TY - JOUR
T1 - Revision and Salvage Management
T2 - Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle
AU - the International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle
AU - Mittwede, Peter N.
AU - Murawski, Christopher D.
AU - Ackermann, Jakob
AU - Görtz, Simon
AU - Hintermann, Beat
AU - Kim, Hak Jun
AU - Thordarson, David B.
AU - Vannini, Francesca
AU - Younger, Alastair S.E.
AU - Adams, Samuel B.
AU - Andrews, Carol L.
AU - Angthong, Chayanin
AU - Batista, Jorge P.
AU - Baur, Onno L.
AU - Bayer, Steve
AU - Becher, Christoph
AU - Berlet, Gregory C.
AU - Boakye, Lorraine A.T.
AU - Brown, Alexandra J.
AU - Buda, Roberto
AU - Calder, James D.F.
AU - Canata, Gian Luigi
AU - Carreira, Dominic S.
AU - Clanton, Thomas O.
AU - Dahmen, Jari
AU - D’Hooghe, Pieter
AU - DiGiovanni, Christopher W.
AU - Dombrowski, Malcolm E.
AU - Drakos, Mark C.
AU - Ferkel, Richard D.
AU - Ferrao, Paulo N.F.
AU - Fortier, Lisa A.
AU - Glazebrook, Mark
AU - Giza, Eric
AU - Gomaa, Mohamed
AU - Haleem, Amgad M.
AU - Hamid, Kamran
AU - Hangody, Laszlo
AU - Hannon, Charles P.
AU - Haverkamp, Daniel
AU - Hertel, Jay
AU - Hogan, Ma Calus V.
AU - Hunt, Kenneth J.
AU - Hurley, Eoghan T.
AU - Karlsson, Jón
AU - Kearns, Stephen R.
AU - Kennedy, John G.
AU - Kerkhoffs, Gino M.M.J.
AU - Kong, Siu Wah
AU - Lee, Jin Woo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article was to report on the consensus statements on “Revision and Salvage Management” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 8 statements on revision and salvage management reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with revision and salvage management in the cartilage repair of the ankle.
AB - Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article was to report on the consensus statements on “Revision and Salvage Management” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed on in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%. Results: A total of 8 statements on revision and salvage management reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support and 7 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 85% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with revision and salvage management in the cartilage repair of the ankle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049887204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049887204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1071100718781863
DO - 10.1177/1071100718781863
M3 - Article
C2 - 30215315
AN - SCOPUS:85049887204
SN - 1071-1007
VL - 39
SP - 54S-60S
JO - Foot and Ankle International
JF - Foot and Ankle International
IS - 1_suppl
ER -