Abstract
This article provides a meta-research of comparative communication science articles published in 32 communication journals between 2003 and 2021. Relying on a combination of automated and manual content analysis, we find a gradual increase in the proportion of comparative studies throughout the 19-year span, although their overall presence remains limited. Through a longitudinal lens, we dissect evolving trends in themes, methodologies, studied cases, and authorship of comparative communication research, with political communication emerging as a prominent topic. We also identify a preference for quantitative methodologies over qualitative or mixed-method approaches. Assessing the geographic patterns of cases and authorship locations, our results echo previous meta-research studies by finding that comparative research is yet another subdiscipline with a strong dominance of Western countries. Discussing these findings, we highlight the critical need for future comparative communication research to foster global representation and inclusivity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1103-1128 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | International Journal of Communication |
| Volume | 19 |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2025 (Fabienne Lind, Hyunjin Song, Hajo G. Boomgaarden, Ahrabhi Kathirgamalingam, Kim Pamina Syed Ali, and Rens Vliegenthart). Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd). Available at http://ijoc.org.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Communication
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Research Practices in Comparative Communication Research: Visibility, Topical and Geographical Disparities, and their Longitudinal Patterns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver