TY - JOUR
T1 - Recurrence and risk factors of posterior communicating artery aneurysms after endovascular treatment
AU - Kim, Min Jeoung
AU - Chung, Joonho
AU - Park, Keun Young
AU - Kim, Dong Joon
AU - Kim, Byung Moon
AU - Suh, Sang Hyun
AU - Lee, Jae Whan
AU - Huh, Seung Kon
AU - Kim, Yong Bae
AU - Joo, Jin Yang
AU - Son, Nak Hoon
AU - Jang, Chang Ki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) of posterior communicating artery aneurysms (PcomA) is challenging because of posterior communicating artery (Pcom) architecture. Additionally, these aneurysms have a high risk of recanalization compared with those located elsewhere. Methods: The radiographic findings of 171 patients treated with EVT at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, and subgroup analyses were performed based on Pcom characteristics. Results: Recanalization of PcomAs occurred in 53 patients (30.9%). Seven patients (4.0%) were retreated (six endovascularly and one with microsurgical clipping). The mean follow-up duration was 27.7 months (range: 3.5–78.6). The maximum diameter (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, P =.006, 95% CI 1.07–1.44), a Raymond–Roy classification of grade II or III (OR 2.26, P =.03, 95% CI 1.08–4.82), and the presence of reinforcement (balloon or/and stent, OR 0.44, P =.03, 95% CI 0.20–0.91) were associated with recanalization using multivariate logistic regression. Significant differences were found in maximum aneurysm diameter (P =.03) between normal- and fetal-type Pcoms on analysis of variance. Conclusions: The recanalization rate of PcomAs after EVT was 30.9%; the retreatment rate was 4.0%. Maximum diameter, Raymond–Roy classification, and presence of reinforcement were significantly associated with recanalization but not associated with fetal-type Pcom. Aneurysm size was larger in patients with a fetal-type Pcom than in those with a normal Pcom. Pcom size was not related to recanalization rate.
AB - Background: Endovascular treatment (EVT) of posterior communicating artery aneurysms (PcomA) is challenging because of posterior communicating artery (Pcom) architecture. Additionally, these aneurysms have a high risk of recanalization compared with those located elsewhere. Methods: The radiographic findings of 171 patients treated with EVT at two institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed, and subgroup analyses were performed based on Pcom characteristics. Results: Recanalization of PcomAs occurred in 53 patients (30.9%). Seven patients (4.0%) were retreated (six endovascularly and one with microsurgical clipping). The mean follow-up duration was 27.7 months (range: 3.5–78.6). The maximum diameter (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, P =.006, 95% CI 1.07–1.44), a Raymond–Roy classification of grade II or III (OR 2.26, P =.03, 95% CI 1.08–4.82), and the presence of reinforcement (balloon or/and stent, OR 0.44, P =.03, 95% CI 0.20–0.91) were associated with recanalization using multivariate logistic regression. Significant differences were found in maximum aneurysm diameter (P =.03) between normal- and fetal-type Pcoms on analysis of variance. Conclusions: The recanalization rate of PcomAs after EVT was 30.9%; the retreatment rate was 4.0%. Maximum diameter, Raymond–Roy classification, and presence of reinforcement were significantly associated with recanalization but not associated with fetal-type Pcom. Aneurysm size was larger in patients with a fetal-type Pcom than in those with a normal Pcom. Pcom size was not related to recanalization rate.
KW - Endovascular treatment
KW - Fetal-type Pcom
KW - Posterior communicating artery aneurysm
KW - Raymond–Roy classification
KW - Recanalization
KW - Reinforcement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108228706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108228706&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00701-021-04881-5
DO - 10.1007/s00701-021-04881-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 34143318
AN - SCOPUS:85108228706
SN - 0001-6268
VL - 163
SP - 2319
EP - 2326
JO - Acta Neurochirurgica
JF - Acta Neurochirurgica
IS - 8
ER -