Abstract
In our article, we reported the observation of monoclinic M2 to M1 structural phase transition in VO2 single crystal near the temperature of ∼49 °C. However, the re-examination of Laue patterns reveals that previously defined monoclinic M1 and M2 phases can be interpreted as monoclinic M2 and triclinic T phases instead. Careful experimental geometry calibration and further refinement of the lattice parameter ratios and angles show that monoclinic M2 and triclinic T phases fit better with the experimental data. On the other hand, our previous misidentification of the insulating phases does NOT affect the conclusions of our article.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 206 |
Number of pages | 1 |
Journal | Physica Status Solidi - Rapid Research Letters |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 Mar 1 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2015 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Materials Science(all)
- Condensed Matter Physics