TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Kim, In Soo
AU - Kim, Hyun Jung
AU - Kim, Tae Hoon
AU - Uhm, Jae Sun
AU - Joung, Boyoung
AU - Lee, Moon Hyoung
AU - Pak, Hui Nam
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Japanese College of Cardiology
PY - 2018/8
Y1 - 2018/8
N2 - Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with atrial fibrillation (AF), depending on dose and/or renal function. Methods: After systematically searching the databases (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), 5 phase III randomized controlled trials and reported data according to subgroups of elderly/non-elderly AF patients, comparing any NOACs and warfarin were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke/systemic thromboembolism and major bleeding. Results: (1) NOACs showed better efficacy than warfarin in elderly patients [RR 0.83 (0.69–1.00), p = 0.04, I2 = 55%], but equivalent efficacy in non-elderly patients. (2) NOACs reduced major bleeding compared to warfarin in non-elderly (p < 0.001) and had comparable safety to warfarin in elderly patients. (3) Even in elderly patients with moderately impaired renal function, NOACs had a safety profile comparable to that of warfarin for major bleeding if dose reduction was reached appropriately [pooled RR 0.82 (0.35–1.88), p = 0.63, I2 = 63%]. (4) All-cause mortality was lower with NOACs in non-elderly patients [RR 0.89 (0.83–0.95), p = 0.001, I2 = 0%], and with standard-dose NOAC group of elderly patients [RR 0.93 (0.86–1.00), p = 0.04, I2 = 0%] compared to warfarin. Conclusions: For elderly patients (aged ≥75 years), NOACs showed better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin even in those with moderately impaired renal function. All-cause mortality was lower with standard-dose NOACs compared to warfarin in the elderly patient group. Systematic review registration: The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO under CRD42016047922 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42016047922).
AB - Background: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with atrial fibrillation (AF), depending on dose and/or renal function. Methods: After systematically searching the databases (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), 5 phase III randomized controlled trials and reported data according to subgroups of elderly/non-elderly AF patients, comparing any NOACs and warfarin were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke/systemic thromboembolism and major bleeding. Results: (1) NOACs showed better efficacy than warfarin in elderly patients [RR 0.83 (0.69–1.00), p = 0.04, I2 = 55%], but equivalent efficacy in non-elderly patients. (2) NOACs reduced major bleeding compared to warfarin in non-elderly (p < 0.001) and had comparable safety to warfarin in elderly patients. (3) Even in elderly patients with moderately impaired renal function, NOACs had a safety profile comparable to that of warfarin for major bleeding if dose reduction was reached appropriately [pooled RR 0.82 (0.35–1.88), p = 0.63, I2 = 63%]. (4) All-cause mortality was lower with NOACs in non-elderly patients [RR 0.89 (0.83–0.95), p = 0.001, I2 = 0%], and with standard-dose NOAC group of elderly patients [RR 0.93 (0.86–1.00), p = 0.04, I2 = 0%] compared to warfarin. Conclusions: For elderly patients (aged ≥75 years), NOACs showed better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin even in those with moderately impaired renal function. All-cause mortality was lower with standard-dose NOACs compared to warfarin in the elderly patient group. Systematic review registration: The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO under CRD42016047922 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42016047922).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042883620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042883620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.015
DO - 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 29519547
AN - SCOPUS:85042883620
SN - 0914-5087
VL - 72
SP - 105
EP - 112
JO - Journal of Cardiology
JF - Journal of Cardiology
IS - 2
ER -