TY - JOUR
T1 - Neurophysiological evidence for the country-of-origin effect
T2 - An event-related potential study
AU - Min, Byoung Kyong
AU - Cho, Kwangsu
AU - Sung, Jungyeon
AU - Cho, Erin
PY - 2014/3/5
Y1 - 2014/3/5
N2 - Consumers often rely on observable cues that hint at the hidden quality of a product. The aim of this study was to investigate brain activities associated with the country-of-origin (COO) effect and consumer evaluation of a product design. Electroencephalogram recordings were used to observe event-related brain potentials associated with the COO effect and design evaluation. We found that the frontocentral N90 and parieto-occipital P220 amplitudes are involved in forming preference to design, whereas the COO effect is processed in the centroparietal P500 amplitude. We also found a significant interaction effect between COO and design preference with regard to reaction times. Specifically, participants tended to spend more time making a preference decision when they did not like the product design made in a country with a favorable COO. These results imply that the two cognitive processes, evaluation of COO and formation of design preference, are activated independently at an early stage. It also suggests that these two processes interact with each other toward the end of the decision phase. Together, the results of this study provide neuropsychological evidence supporting a significant role of COO in the formation of design preference. Future studies are required to further delve into other neurophysiological activities associated with the COO effect.
AB - Consumers often rely on observable cues that hint at the hidden quality of a product. The aim of this study was to investigate brain activities associated with the country-of-origin (COO) effect and consumer evaluation of a product design. Electroencephalogram recordings were used to observe event-related brain potentials associated with the COO effect and design evaluation. We found that the frontocentral N90 and parieto-occipital P220 amplitudes are involved in forming preference to design, whereas the COO effect is processed in the centroparietal P500 amplitude. We also found a significant interaction effect between COO and design preference with regard to reaction times. Specifically, participants tended to spend more time making a preference decision when they did not like the product design made in a country with a favorable COO. These results imply that the two cognitive processes, evaluation of COO and formation of design preference, are activated independently at an early stage. It also suggests that these two processes interact with each other toward the end of the decision phase. Together, the results of this study provide neuropsychological evidence supporting a significant role of COO in the formation of design preference. Future studies are required to further delve into other neurophysiological activities associated with the COO effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894599981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894599981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000102
DO - 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000102
M3 - Article
C2 - 24518230
AN - SCOPUS:84894599981
SN - 0959-4965
VL - 25
SP - 274
EP - 278
JO - NeuroReport
JF - NeuroReport
IS - 4
ER -