Abstract
We examine tippy network markets that accommodate price discrimination. The analysis shows that when a mild equilibrium refinement, the monotonicity criterion, is adopted, network competition may have a unique subgame-perfect equilibrium regarding the winner's identity; the prevailing brand may be fully determined by its product features. We bring out the concept of the dominant value margin, which is a metric of the effectiveness of divide-and-conquer strategies. The supplier with the larger dominant value margin may always sell to all customers in equilibrium. Such a market outcome is not necessarily socially efficient.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1805-1827 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | International Economic Review |
Volume | 63 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 Nov |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© (2022) by the Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Economics and Econometrics