TY - JOUR
T1 - Neointimal response to second-generation drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with de-novo coronary lesions
T2 - Intravascular ultrasound study
AU - Won, Hoyoun
AU - Kang, Tae Soo
AU - Hong, Bum Kee
AU - Lee, Seunghwan
AU - Jeon, Dong Woon
AU - Ryu, Sung Kee
AU - Min, Pil Ki
AU - Yoon, Young Won
AU - Lee, Byoung Kwon
AU - Kwon, Hyuck Moon
AU - Ko, Young Guk
AU - Jang, Yangsoo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
PY - 2015/4/22
Y1 - 2015/4/22
N2 - Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of neointimal response after the implantation of a second-generation drug-eluting stent, zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES-ER, Endeavor Resolute) or everolimus-eluting stent (EES, Xience V), using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in diabetic patients. Materials and methods In all, 154 diabetic patients with de-novo coronary lesions were randomized to be implanted with a ZES-ER or EES, and the angiographic follow-up at 9 months combined with a complete IVUS study was available for 96 patients with 101 lesions. Results Baseline demographic and lesion parameters were similar in both groups at index percutaneous coronary intervention. On follow-up angiography, in-stent late lumen loss and minimal lumen diameter were not different between the two groups. On IVUS study, neointimal hyperplasia volume [median (interquartile range): ZES-ER vs. EES; 2.25 mm 3 (0.57-6.25) vs. 1.59 mm 3 (0.45-8.37), P=0.615] and in-stent percentage of volume obstruction [median (interquartile range): ZES-ER vs. EES; 1.16% (0.33-3.61) vs. 0.77% (0.29-4.01), P=0.615] showed similar results between the two groups. Conclusion In diabetic patients, the second-generation drug-eluting stents, ZES-ER and EES, were comparable in inhibiting neointimal proliferation.
AB - Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent of neointimal response after the implantation of a second-generation drug-eluting stent, zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES-ER, Endeavor Resolute) or everolimus-eluting stent (EES, Xience V), using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in diabetic patients. Materials and methods In all, 154 diabetic patients with de-novo coronary lesions were randomized to be implanted with a ZES-ER or EES, and the angiographic follow-up at 9 months combined with a complete IVUS study was available for 96 patients with 101 lesions. Results Baseline demographic and lesion parameters were similar in both groups at index percutaneous coronary intervention. On follow-up angiography, in-stent late lumen loss and minimal lumen diameter were not different between the two groups. On IVUS study, neointimal hyperplasia volume [median (interquartile range): ZES-ER vs. EES; 2.25 mm 3 (0.57-6.25) vs. 1.59 mm 3 (0.45-8.37), P=0.615] and in-stent percentage of volume obstruction [median (interquartile range): ZES-ER vs. EES; 1.16% (0.33-3.61) vs. 0.77% (0.29-4.01), P=0.615] showed similar results between the two groups. Conclusion In diabetic patients, the second-generation drug-eluting stents, ZES-ER and EES, were comparable in inhibiting neointimal proliferation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928275422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928275422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000195
DO - 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000195
M3 - Article
C2 - 25426659
AN - SCOPUS:84928275422
SN - 0954-6928
VL - 26
SP - 212
EP - 219
JO - Coronary artery disease
JF - Coronary artery disease
IS - 3
ER -