TY - JOUR
T1 - Modelling the impact of rapid diagnostic tests on Plasmodium vivax malaria in South Korea
T2 - A cost-benefit analysis
AU - Kim, Jung Ho
AU - Suh, Jiyeon
AU - Lee, Woon Ji
AU - Choi, Heun
AU - Kim, Jong Dae
AU - Kim, Changsoo
AU - Choi, Jun Yong
AU - Ko, Ryeojin
AU - Kim, Heewon
AU - Lee, Jeehyun
AU - Yeom, Joon Sup
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2021/2/16
Y1 - 2021/2/16
N2 - Background Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used for diagnosing Plasmodium vivax malaria, especially in resource-limited countries. However, the impact of RDTs on P. vivax malaria incidence and national medical costs has not been evaluated. We assessed the impact of RDT implementation on P. vivax malaria incidence and overall medical expenditures in South Korea and performed a cost-benefit analysis from the payer's perspective. Methods We developed a dynamic compartmental model for P. vivax malaria transmission in South Korea using delay differential equations. Long latency and seasonality were incorporated into the model, which was calibrated to civilian malaria incidences during 2014-2018. We then estimated averted malaria cases and total medical costs from two diagnostic scenarios: microscopy only and both microscopy and RDTs. Medical costs were extracted based on data from a hospital in an at-risk area for P. vivax malaria and were validated using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service data. We conducted a cost-benefit analysis of RDTs using the incremental benefit:cost ratio (IBCR) considering only medical costs and performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to reflect the uncertainties of model parameters, costs and benefits. Results The results showed that 55.3% of new P. vivax malaria cases were averted, and 696 214 in medical costs was saved over 10 years after RDT introduction. The estimated IBCR was 2.5, indicating that RDT implementation was beneficial, compared with microscopy alone. The IBCR was sensitive to the diagnosis time reduction, infectious period and short latency period, and provided beneficial results in a benefit over 10.6 or RDT cost under 39.7. Conclusions The model simulation suggested that RDTs could significantly reduce P. vivax malaria incidence and medical costs. Moreover, cost-benefit analysis demonstrated that the introduction of RDTs was beneficial over microscopy alone. These results support the need for widespread adoption of RDTs.
AB - Background Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used for diagnosing Plasmodium vivax malaria, especially in resource-limited countries. However, the impact of RDTs on P. vivax malaria incidence and national medical costs has not been evaluated. We assessed the impact of RDT implementation on P. vivax malaria incidence and overall medical expenditures in South Korea and performed a cost-benefit analysis from the payer's perspective. Methods We developed a dynamic compartmental model for P. vivax malaria transmission in South Korea using delay differential equations. Long latency and seasonality were incorporated into the model, which was calibrated to civilian malaria incidences during 2014-2018. We then estimated averted malaria cases and total medical costs from two diagnostic scenarios: microscopy only and both microscopy and RDTs. Medical costs were extracted based on data from a hospital in an at-risk area for P. vivax malaria and were validated using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service data. We conducted a cost-benefit analysis of RDTs using the incremental benefit:cost ratio (IBCR) considering only medical costs and performed a probabilistic sensitivity analysis to reflect the uncertainties of model parameters, costs and benefits. Results The results showed that 55.3% of new P. vivax malaria cases were averted, and 696 214 in medical costs was saved over 10 years after RDT introduction. The estimated IBCR was 2.5, indicating that RDT implementation was beneficial, compared with microscopy alone. The IBCR was sensitive to the diagnosis time reduction, infectious period and short latency period, and provided beneficial results in a benefit over 10.6 or RDT cost under 39.7. Conclusions The model simulation suggested that RDTs could significantly reduce P. vivax malaria incidence and medical costs. Moreover, cost-benefit analysis demonstrated that the introduction of RDTs was beneficial over microscopy alone. These results support the need for widespread adoption of RDTs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100948237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100948237&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004292
DO - 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004292
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100948237
SN - 2059-7908
VL - 6
JO - BMJ Global Health
JF - BMJ Global Health
IS - 2
M1 - e004292
ER -