Abstract
Eliminative reasoning is a method that has been employed in many significant episodes in the history of science. It has also been advocated by some philosophers as an important means for justifying well-established scientific theories. Arguments for how eliminative reasoning is able to do so, however, have generally relied on a too narrow conception of evidence, and have therefore tended to lapse into merely heuristic or pragmatic justifications for their conclusions. This paper shows how a broader conception of evidence not only can supply the needed justification but also illuminates the methodological significance of eliminative reasoning in a variety of contexts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 15-29 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Studies in history and philosophy of science |
Volume | 90 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |