Measuring researchers' potential scholarly impact with structural variations: Four types of researchers in information science (1979-2018)

Jianhua Hou, Xiucai Yang, Chaomei Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We propose a method to measure the potential scholarly impact of researchers based on network structural variations they introduced to the underlying author co-citation network of their field. We applied the method to the information science field based on 91,978 papers published between 1979 and 2018 from the Web of Science. We divided the entire period into eight consecutive intervals and measured structural variation change rates (ΔM) of individual authors in corresponding author co-citation networks. Four types of researchers are identified in terms of temporal dynamics of their potential scholarly impact-1) Increasing, 2) Decreasing, 3) Sustained, and 4) Transient. The study contributes to the understanding of how researchers' scholarly impact might evolve in a broad context of the corresponding research community. Specifically, this study illustrated a crucial role played by structural variation metrics in measuring and explaining the potential scholarly impact of a researcher. This method based on the structural variation analysis offers a theoretical framework and a practical platform to analyze the potential scholarly impact of researchers and their specific contributions.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0234347
JournalPloS one
Volume15
Issue number6 June
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Jun

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring researchers' potential scholarly impact with structural variations: Four types of researchers in information science (1979-2018)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this