TY - JOUR
T1 - Marx's value forms and Hayek's rules
T2 - A reinterpretation in the light of the dichotomy between physis and nomos
AU - Hong, Hoon
PY - 2002/9
Y1 - 2002/9
N2 - This paper argues that both Marx and Hayek objected to the dichotomy between physis and nomos, and offered concepts which integrate, or mediate between, the two. Marx's value forms and Hayek's rules aim to grasp something neither purely natural nor purely artificial or social, but 'socially natural'. Value forms and rules are natural in the sense that they pre-exist agents and are taken by agents as given. On the other hand, forms and rules are social in that production relations or spontaneous order are reproduced as the unintended consequences of agents' using forms or following rules. Thus value forms and rules stand as links between agents and production relations or spontaneous order.
AB - This paper argues that both Marx and Hayek objected to the dichotomy between physis and nomos, and offered concepts which integrate, or mediate between, the two. Marx's value forms and Hayek's rules aim to grasp something neither purely natural nor purely artificial or social, but 'socially natural'. Value forms and rules are natural in the sense that they pre-exist agents and are taken by agents as given. On the other hand, forms and rules are social in that production relations or spontaneous order are reproduced as the unintended consequences of agents' using forms or following rules. Thus value forms and rules stand as links between agents and production relations or spontaneous order.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036732864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036732864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/cje/26.5.613
DO - 10.1093/cje/26.5.613
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036732864
SN - 0309-166X
VL - 26
SP - 613
EP - 635
JO - Cambridge Journal of Economics
JF - Cambridge Journal of Economics
IS - 5
ER -