TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-term efficacy of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus ablation during atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without typical atrial flutter
T2 - A prospective, multicentre, randomized trial
AU - Kim, Sung Hwan
AU - Oh, Yong Seog
AU - Choi, Young
AU - Hwang, Youmi
AU - Kim, Ju Youn
AU - Kim, Tae Seok
AU - Kim, Ji Hoon
AU - Jang, Sung Won
AU - Lee, Man Young
AU - Joung, Boyoung
AU - Choi, Kee Joon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020. The Korean Society of Cardiology
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background and Objectives: Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block is easily achieved, and prophylactic ablation can be performed during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the previous study was too small and short-term to clarify the efficacy of this block. Methods: Patients who underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF were enrolled, and patients who had previous or induced atrial flutter (AFL) were excluded. We randomly assigned 366 patients to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only and prophylactic CTI ablation (PVI vs. PVI+CTI). Results: There was no significant difference in procedure time between the two groups because most CTI blocks were performed during the waiting time after the PVI (176.8±72.6 minutes in PVI vs. 174.2±76.5 minutes in PVI+CTI, p=0.75). All patients were followed up for at least 18 months, and the median follow-up was 3.4 years. The recurrence rate of AF or AFL was not different in the 2 groups (25.7% in PVI vs. 25.7% in PVI+CTI, p=0.92). The recurrence rate of any AFL was not significantly different in the 2 groups (3.3% in PVI vs. 1.6% in PVI+CTI, p=0.31). The recurrence rate of typical AFL also was not different (0.5% in PVI vs. 0.5% in PVI+CTI, p=0.99). Conclusions: In this large and long-term follow-up study, prophylactic CTI ablation had no benefit in patients with paroxysmal AF without typical AFL.
AB - Background and Objectives: Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block is easily achieved, and prophylactic ablation can be performed during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, the previous study was too small and short-term to clarify the efficacy of this block. Methods: Patients who underwent catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF were enrolled, and patients who had previous or induced atrial flutter (AFL) were excluded. We randomly assigned 366 patients to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) only and prophylactic CTI ablation (PVI vs. PVI+CTI). Results: There was no significant difference in procedure time between the two groups because most CTI blocks were performed during the waiting time after the PVI (176.8±72.6 minutes in PVI vs. 174.2±76.5 minutes in PVI+CTI, p=0.75). All patients were followed up for at least 18 months, and the median follow-up was 3.4 years. The recurrence rate of AF or AFL was not different in the 2 groups (25.7% in PVI vs. 25.7% in PVI+CTI, p=0.92). The recurrence rate of any AFL was not significantly different in the 2 groups (3.3% in PVI vs. 1.6% in PVI+CTI, p=0.31). The recurrence rate of typical AFL also was not different (0.5% in PVI vs. 0.5% in PVI+CTI, p=0.99). Conclusions: In this large and long-term follow-up study, prophylactic CTI ablation had no benefit in patients with paroxysmal AF without typical AFL.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092248490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092248490&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4070/KCJ.2020.0174
DO - 10.4070/KCJ.2020.0174
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092248490
SN - 1738-5520
VL - 50
JO - Korean Circulation Journal
JF - Korean Circulation Journal
IS - 12
M1 - e142
ER -