TY - JOUR
T1 - Liability of Asianness? Global talent management challenges of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean multinationals
AU - Froese, Fabian Jintae
AU - Shen, Jie
AU - Sekiguchi, Tomoki
AU - Davies, Samuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Within a short time, China, Japan, and Korea have produced worldwide leading multinational enterprises (MNEs). As they expand globally, these companies face major challenges in global talent management (GTM). This article provides a comparative analysis of the major GTM challenges MNEs from these countries experience and the underlying reasons thereof. Our comparative overview reveals similarities in ethnocentric staffing, traditional headquarters-driven organizational cultures, and home-country language policies. While there are striking differences in performance appraisal, reward and compensation, and promotion and career advancement, these GTM practices of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean MNEs are converging to Western style global best practices, though at different levels. Building on and enriching the convergence debate and the distance literature, we identify organizational and country characteristics that help better understand the reasons for these similarities and differences.
AB - Within a short time, China, Japan, and Korea have produced worldwide leading multinational enterprises (MNEs). As they expand globally, these companies face major challenges in global talent management (GTM). This article provides a comparative analysis of the major GTM challenges MNEs from these countries experience and the underlying reasons thereof. Our comparative overview reveals similarities in ethnocentric staffing, traditional headquarters-driven organizational cultures, and home-country language policies. While there are striking differences in performance appraisal, reward and compensation, and promotion and career advancement, these GTM practices of Chinese, Japanese, and Korean MNEs are converging to Western style global best practices, though at different levels. Building on and enriching the convergence debate and the distance literature, we identify organizational and country characteristics that help better understand the reasons for these similarities and differences.
KW - China
KW - Convergence
KW - Divergence
KW - Global talent management
KW - Institutional distance
KW - Japan
KW - Korea
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089143761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089143761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100776
DO - 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100776
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85089143761
SN - 1053-4822
VL - 30
JO - Human Resource Management Review
JF - Human Resource Management Review
IS - 4
M1 - 100776
ER -