TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for ureterolithotomy
T2 - Focus on intracorporeal stenting and suturing
AU - Choi, Kyung Hwa
AU - Yang, Seung Choul
AU - Lee, Jae Won
AU - Rha, Koon Ho
AU - Han, Woong Kyu
PY - 2010/12
Y1 - 2010/12
N2 - Objectives To describe a technique of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for ureterolithotomy, focusing on intracorporeal stenting and suturing. Methods From August 2009 to May 2010, 8 cases of LESS ureterolithotomy were performed by a single, experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The indications for LESS ureterolithotomy were a stone size of <15 mm, an impacted stone, intractable pain, or failure of previous treatment. All procedures were done using a platform homemade port device that was inserted through a 20-30-mm umbilical incision. We developed our own percutaneous stenting method and intracorporeal suture technique to suit the single port procedure. Additional ports and a stone retrieval bag were not needed. Results All LESS ureterolithotomies were performed successfully without any complications. The mean stone size was 17.4 mm (range 11-24), and the stones were located in the upper ureter in all 8 patients. The mean operative time was 155.3 minutes (range 102-227), and the estimated blood loss was 37.5 mL (range <10-150). The mean postoperative time to stent removal was 3.4 weeks (range 1-4). Conclusions LESS ureterolithotomy using our technique was safe and effective, and the ureteral stenting and suturing techniques were a feasible alternative to those currently used for LESS.
AB - Objectives To describe a technique of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for ureterolithotomy, focusing on intracorporeal stenting and suturing. Methods From August 2009 to May 2010, 8 cases of LESS ureterolithotomy were performed by a single, experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The indications for LESS ureterolithotomy were a stone size of <15 mm, an impacted stone, intractable pain, or failure of previous treatment. All procedures were done using a platform homemade port device that was inserted through a 20-30-mm umbilical incision. We developed our own percutaneous stenting method and intracorporeal suture technique to suit the single port procedure. Additional ports and a stone retrieval bag were not needed. Results All LESS ureterolithotomies were performed successfully without any complications. The mean stone size was 17.4 mm (range 11-24), and the stones were located in the upper ureter in all 8 patients. The mean operative time was 155.3 minutes (range 102-227), and the estimated blood loss was 37.5 mL (range <10-150). The mean postoperative time to stent removal was 3.4 weeks (range 1-4). Conclusions LESS ureterolithotomy using our technique was safe and effective, and the ureteral stenting and suturing techniques were a feasible alternative to those currently used for LESS.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649937742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649937742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2010.09.006
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2010.09.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 21130244
AN - SCOPUS:78649937742
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 76
SP - 1283
EP - 1287
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 6
ER -