Joint effect of cigarette smoking and body mass index on white blood cell count in Korean adults

A. Ra Cho, Won Jun Choi, Shin Hye Kim, Jae Yong Shim, Yong Jae Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: White blood cell count is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Several lifestyle and metabolic factors such as cigarette smoking and obesity are known to be associated with an elevated white blood cell count. However, the joint effect of cigarette smoking and obesity on white blood cell count has not yet been fully described. Methods: We explored the joint effect of cigarette smoking and obesity on white blood cell count using multiple logistic regression analyses after adjusting for confounding variables in a population-based, cross-sectional study of 416,065 Korean adults. Results: Cigarette smoking and body mass index have a dose-response relationship with a higher white blood cell count, but no synergistic interaction is observed between them (men, P for interaction=0.797; women, P for interaction= 0.311). Cigarette smoking and body mass index might have an additive combination effect on high white blood cell count. Obese male smokers were 2.36 times more likely and obese female smokers 2.35 times more likely to have a high white blood cell count when compared with normal body mass index non-smokers. Conclusion: Cigarette smoking and body mass index are independently associated with an elevated white blood cell count in both men and women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-80
Number of pages6
JournalKorean Journal of Family Medicine
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Korean Academy of Family Medicine.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Family Practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Joint effect of cigarette smoking and body mass index on white blood cell count in Korean adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this