TY - JOUR
T1 - Is US-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) enough in probably benign nodules with interval growth?
AU - Yoon, J. H.
AU - Kim, E. K.
AU - Kwak, J. Y.
AU - Moon, H. J.
AU - Kim, M. J.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Purpose: To investigate whether ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (US-CNB) is efficient in the diagnosis of probably benign lesions showing interval growth on follow-up US. Materials and Methods: From March 2008 to August 2009, 116 breast lesions in 113 women (mean age: 41.2 years, range: 19-63 years) which were initially assessed as category 3 showing interval growth on follow-up US underwent US-CNB, and subsequent US-guided vacuum-assisted excision, surgical excision or follow-up US for at least 12 months. Diagnostic performances of US-CNB were evaluated with histopathologic results and follow-up US as standard reference. Clinical features of the patient and lesions characteristics including follow-up interval (I), the most increased diameter (D), D per I, increased volume (%V) and %V per I were calculated and compared. Results: Of the 116 lesions, 4 lesions were diagnosed as malignancy and 112 as benign on final pathology. Malignancy rate of probably benign lesions showing interval growth was 3.4% (4/116). Incorrect biopsy rate was 0.9% (1/116). Palpability or newly developed suspicious US features were more associated with malignancy, 75.0 to 13.4% and 50.0 to 25.9%, respectively, but without significance (p=0.063 and 0.290). Significant differences were seen in average rank when comparing between benign and malignancy in D, %V, D per follow-up interval (I), and %V/I (p=0.037, 0.017, 0.043 and 0.009, respectively). Conclusion: US-CNB is an efficient diagnostic method for probably benign lesions showing interval growth, with discordant biopsy rate of 0.9%.
AB - Purpose: To investigate whether ultrasound-guided 14-gauge core needle biopsy (US-CNB) is efficient in the diagnosis of probably benign lesions showing interval growth on follow-up US. Materials and Methods: From March 2008 to August 2009, 116 breast lesions in 113 women (mean age: 41.2 years, range: 19-63 years) which were initially assessed as category 3 showing interval growth on follow-up US underwent US-CNB, and subsequent US-guided vacuum-assisted excision, surgical excision or follow-up US for at least 12 months. Diagnostic performances of US-CNB were evaluated with histopathologic results and follow-up US as standard reference. Clinical features of the patient and lesions characteristics including follow-up interval (I), the most increased diameter (D), D per I, increased volume (%V) and %V per I were calculated and compared. Results: Of the 116 lesions, 4 lesions were diagnosed as malignancy and 112 as benign on final pathology. Malignancy rate of probably benign lesions showing interval growth was 3.4% (4/116). Incorrect biopsy rate was 0.9% (1/116). Palpability or newly developed suspicious US features were more associated with malignancy, 75.0 to 13.4% and 50.0 to 25.9%, respectively, but without significance (p=0.063 and 0.290). Significant differences were seen in average rank when comparing between benign and malignancy in D, %V, D per follow-up interval (I), and %V/I (p=0.037, 0.017, 0.043 and 0.009, respectively). Conclusion: US-CNB is an efficient diagnostic method for probably benign lesions showing interval growth, with discordant biopsy rate of 0.9%.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871652187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871652187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-0032-1313208
DO - 10.1055/s-0032-1313208
M3 - Article
C2 - 23023453
AN - SCOPUS:84871652187
SN - 0172-4614
VL - 33
SP - E145-E150
JO - Ultraschall in der Medizin
JF - Ultraschall in der Medizin
IS - 7
ER -