TY - JOUR
T1 - How to manage pyloric tumours that are difficult to resect completely with endoscopic resection
T2 - Comparison of the retroflexion vs. forward view technique
AU - Park, Jun Chul
AU - Kim, Jie Hyun
AU - Youn, Young Hoon
AU - Cheoi, Kyungseok
AU - Chung, Hyunsoo
AU - Kim, Hyunki
AU - Lee, Hyuk
AU - Shin, Sung Kwan
AU - Lee, Sang Kil
AU - Kim, Hoguen
AU - Park, Hyojin
AU - Lee, Sang In
AU - Lee, Yong Chan
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - Background: It is difficult to perform complete resection of prepyloric tumours, especially those involving pyloric channel due to incomplete visualisation and insufficient resection margin with forward view. Aim: To investigate outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for pyloric tumours, we assess effectiveness of retroflexion view technique in comparison with forward view technique. Methods: We investigated 47 prepyloric tumours treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection and compared results of forward view technique with those of retroflexion view technique. Results: Of the 47 prepyloric tumours, 23 lesions had pyloric channel involvement (group 1) and 24 lesions did not (group 2). The en bloc resection, curative resection and complete resection rates for all endoscopic submucosal dissection cases were 80.9, 85.1 and 70.2%, respectively. The en bloc resection, curative resection and complete resection rates were significantly lower in group 1 than group 2. Of the tumours involving pyloric channel except 3 cases which were extended to duodenum, 12 lesions were resected with retroflexion and 8 lesions with forward. Curative resection rate was higher in retroflexion group than forward group (91.7% vs. 37.5%; p= 0.018). None of the patients experienced perforation or pyloric stenosis. Conclusions: Endoscopic submucosal dissection using retroflexion manoeuvre is a more effective method for the curative resection of gastric tumours involving pyloric channel.
AB - Background: It is difficult to perform complete resection of prepyloric tumours, especially those involving pyloric channel due to incomplete visualisation and insufficient resection margin with forward view. Aim: To investigate outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for pyloric tumours, we assess effectiveness of retroflexion view technique in comparison with forward view technique. Methods: We investigated 47 prepyloric tumours treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection and compared results of forward view technique with those of retroflexion view technique. Results: Of the 47 prepyloric tumours, 23 lesions had pyloric channel involvement (group 1) and 24 lesions did not (group 2). The en bloc resection, curative resection and complete resection rates for all endoscopic submucosal dissection cases were 80.9, 85.1 and 70.2%, respectively. The en bloc resection, curative resection and complete resection rates were significantly lower in group 1 than group 2. Of the tumours involving pyloric channel except 3 cases which were extended to duodenum, 12 lesions were resected with retroflexion and 8 lesions with forward. Curative resection rate was higher in retroflexion group than forward group (91.7% vs. 37.5%; p= 0.018). None of the patients experienced perforation or pyloric stenosis. Conclusions: Endoscopic submucosal dissection using retroflexion manoeuvre is a more effective method for the curative resection of gastric tumours involving pyloric channel.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055096003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055096003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2011.08.008
DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2011.08.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 21920829
AN - SCOPUS:80055096003
SN - 1590-8658
VL - 43
SP - 958
EP - 964
JO - Digestive and Liver Disease
JF - Digestive and Liver Disease
IS - 12
ER -