Follow-up result afters negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging for hepatic metastasis from rectal cancer

Seok Lim Joon, Myeong Jin Kim, Young Lee Kang, Kyu Kim Nam, Jin Sub Choi, Hee Kim Joo, Taik Oh Young, Ho Kim Won, Whang Kim Ki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: To assess the follow-up results after negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging in rectal cancer patients who have undergone locally curative surgery. Materials and Methods: From all pertinent imaging reports and medical records, we selected 255 patients who had negative results on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging. When selecting patients who had undergone curative resection, the following patients were excluded from the study: 1) patients in whom extrahepatic metastases were detected on preoperative staging work-ups, 2) patients in whom the surgery was judged to be non-curative due to peritoneal seeding or local aggressiveness. Cases with follow-up periods of less than 18 months were also excluded, as these cases were considered insufficient to confirm the negative outcomes. Thus, a total of 149 patients were ultimately enrolled in our study. The follow-up results of unenhanced MR imagings were assessed according to the assumption that the newly developed hepatic metastases had been false-negative lesions on preoperative MR image. Results: During a median follow-up period of 29.3 months, 25 hepatic metastases were detected in 13 patients (8.7%), which indicated a negative predictive value of 91.3%. Conclusion: Unenhanced hepatic MR imaging provides a high negative predictive value with regard to the detection of hepatic metastasis in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-230
Number of pages6
JournalKorean journal of radiology
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2004

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Follow-up result afters negative findings on unenhanced hepatic MR imaging for hepatic metastasis from rectal cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this