TY - JOUR
T1 - Expanding the Understanding of School Concentrated Disadvantage Using Free and Reduced-Price Meals Data
T2 - Links to College and Labor Market Outcomes in Maryland
AU - Henneberger, Angela K.
AU - Rose, Bess A.
AU - Mushonga, Dawnsha R.
AU - Nam, Boyoung
AU - Preston, Alison M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - School concentrated disadvantage has been linked to poorer academic achievement and psychosocial functioning in prior research. The current study expands upon prior examinations of school concentrated disadvantage by applying a measurement approach first described by Michelmore and Dynarski in 2017, where eligibility for free and reduced-price meals (FRPM) is examined over time and the duration of eligibility serves as the key indicator of student disadvantage. We used data from a linked longitudinal administrative data system in Maryland, and we measured disadvantage using the proportion of years a student was eligible for FRPM between 6th and 12th grades (see ref. Michelmore & Dynarski). This measure was aggregated to the school level to measure school concentrated disadvantage. We found that school-level concentrated disadvantage was uniquely, and more strongly related to college enrollment than individual student-level disadvantage. However, early labor market outcomes tended to be more strongly linked to race/ethnicity than experiences with disadvantage. We highlight the need for additional targeted resources for students in schools with high concentrations of disadvantaged students.
AB - School concentrated disadvantage has been linked to poorer academic achievement and psychosocial functioning in prior research. The current study expands upon prior examinations of school concentrated disadvantage by applying a measurement approach first described by Michelmore and Dynarski in 2017, where eligibility for free and reduced-price meals (FRPM) is examined over time and the duration of eligibility serves as the key indicator of student disadvantage. We used data from a linked longitudinal administrative data system in Maryland, and we measured disadvantage using the proportion of years a student was eligible for FRPM between 6th and 12th grades (see ref. Michelmore & Dynarski). This measure was aggregated to the school level to measure school concentrated disadvantage. We found that school-level concentrated disadvantage was uniquely, and more strongly related to college enrollment than individual student-level disadvantage. However, early labor market outcomes tended to be more strongly linked to race/ethnicity than experiences with disadvantage. We highlight the need for additional targeted resources for students in schools with high concentrations of disadvantaged students.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126050194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126050194&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10824669.2022.2045994
DO - 10.1080/10824669.2022.2045994
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126050194
SN - 1082-4669
VL - 28
SP - 150
EP - 178
JO - Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk
JF - Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk
IS - 2
ER -