TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of global case fatality rate of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using meta-analyses
T2 - Comparison between calendar date and days since the outbreak of the first confirmed case
AU - Ghayda, Ramy Abou
AU - Lee, Keum Hwa
AU - Han, Young Joo
AU - Ryu, Seohyun
AU - Hong, Sung Hwi
AU - Yoon, Sojung
AU - Jeong, Gwang Hun
AU - Lee, Jinhee
AU - Lee, Jun Young
AU - Yang, Jae Won
AU - Effenberger, Maria
AU - Eisenhut, Michael
AU - Kronbichler, Andreas
AU - Solmi, Marco
AU - Li, Han
AU - Jacob, Louis
AU - Koyanagi, Ai
AU - Radua, Joaquim
AU - Shin, Jae Il
AU - Smith, Lee
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Objective: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in December of 2019 in China, estimating the pandemic's case fatality rate (CFR) has been the focus and interest of many stakeholders. In this manuscript, we prove that the method of using the cumulative CFR is static and does not reflect the trend according to the daily change per unit of time. Methods: A proportion meta-analysis was carried out on the CFR in every country reporting COVID-19 cases. Based on these results, we performed a meta-analysis for a global COVID-19 CFR. Each analysis was performed using two different calculations of CFR: according to the calendar date and according to the days since the outbreak of the first confirmed case. We thus explored an innovative and original calculation of CFR, concurrently based on the date of the first confirmed case as well as on a daily basis. Results: For the first time, we showed that using meta-analyses according to the calendar date and days since the outbreak of the first confirmed case, were different. Conclusion: We propose that a CFR according to days since the outbreak of the first confirmed case might be a better predictor of the current CFR of COVID-19 and its kinetics.
AB - Objective: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in December of 2019 in China, estimating the pandemic's case fatality rate (CFR) has been the focus and interest of many stakeholders. In this manuscript, we prove that the method of using the cumulative CFR is static and does not reflect the trend according to the daily change per unit of time. Methods: A proportion meta-analysis was carried out on the CFR in every country reporting COVID-19 cases. Based on these results, we performed a meta-analysis for a global COVID-19 CFR. Each analysis was performed using two different calculations of CFR: according to the calendar date and according to the days since the outbreak of the first confirmed case. We thus explored an innovative and original calculation of CFR, concurrently based on the date of the first confirmed case as well as on a daily basis. Results: For the first time, we showed that using meta-analyses according to the calendar date and days since the outbreak of the first confirmed case, were different. Conclusion: We propose that a CFR according to days since the outbreak of the first confirmed case might be a better predictor of the current CFR of COVID-19 and its kinetics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092609333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092609333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.065
DO - 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.065
M3 - Article
C2 - 32882434
AN - SCOPUS:85092609333
SN - 1201-9712
VL - 100
SP - 302
EP - 308
JO - International Journal of Infectious Diseases
JF - International Journal of Infectious Diseases
ER -
