Effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an animal study

Jay Yong Choi; Ik Sang Moon; Jeong Ho Yun; Kwang Ho Park; Jong Ki Huh; Dong Won Lee

doi:10.1111/clr.12720

Effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an animal study

Jay Yong Choi, Ik Sang Moon, Jeong Ho Yun, Kwang Ho Park, Jong Ki Huh, Dong Won Lee

Department of Periodontics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this animal study was to examine the effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant tissues in terms of BIC and hard- and soft-tissue dimensions. Materials and methods: Six Beagle dogs received experimental implants in the mandible 3 month after the removal of premolars and first molars (P2, P3, P4, and M1). Two different types of implants were installed in each animal: Anyone microthread^® as Group 1 and Anyone^® as Group 2. Resonance frequency test, intraoral radiography, micro-CT, and histomorphometry were used to evaluate peri-implant tissue after implantation periods of 4 and 8 weeks. Results: No remarkable complication was observed during the healing period in either group. Resonance frequency testing revealed no significant difference between groups. In radiographic evaluation, Group 2 showed more bone loss than Group 1. However, this difference was not statistically significant. In the micro-CT analysis, BIC and BIV values and soft-tissue height were not significant in both groups. Histological analysis revealed no significant difference in BIC ratio, bone density, or bone loss between groups. However, soft-tissue height was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.0004). Conclusion: No difference in peri-implant hard or soft tissues was observed according to thread size in the implant neck area.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1187-1192
Number of pages	6
Journal	Clinical Oral Implants Research
Volume	27
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12720
Publication status	Published - 2016 Sept 1

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank Dr. Kwang-Bum Park in Megagen Implant and Professor Sung-Soo Kang in Chun Nam University for supporting us the animal experiments. This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) and Dae Gyeong Institute for Regional Program Evaluation (DGIRPE) through the Leading Industry Development for Economic Region (R0001279).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Oral Surgery

Access to Document

10.1111/clr.12720

Cite this

@article{748db93a625344488ec97ef2a9a1436e,

title = "Effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an animal study",

abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this animal study was to examine the effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant tissues in terms of BIC and hard- and soft-tissue dimensions. Materials and methods: Six Beagle dogs received experimental implants in the mandible 3 month after the removal of premolars and first molars (P2, P3, P4, and M1). Two different types of implants were installed in each animal: Anyone microthread{\textregistered} as Group 1 and Anyone{\textregistered} as Group 2. Resonance frequency test, intraoral radiography, micro-CT, and histomorphometry were used to evaluate peri-implant tissue after implantation periods of 4 and 8 weeks. Results: No remarkable complication was observed during the healing period in either group. Resonance frequency testing revealed no significant difference between groups. In radiographic evaluation, Group 2 showed more bone loss than Group 1. However, this difference was not statistically significant. In the micro-CT analysis, BIC and BIV values and soft-tissue height were not significant in both groups. Histological analysis revealed no significant difference in BIC ratio, bone density, or bone loss between groups. However, soft-tissue height was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.0004). Conclusion: No difference in peri-implant hard or soft tissues was observed according to thread size in the implant neck area.",

author = "Choi, {Jay Yong} and Moon, {Ik Sang} and Yun, {Jeong Ho} and Park, {Kwang Ho} and Huh, {Jong Ki} and Lee, {Dong Won}",

note = "Funding Information: We thank Dr. Kwang-Bum Park in Megagen Implant and Professor Sung-Soo Kang in Chun Nam University for supporting us the animal experiments. This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) and Dae Gyeong Institute for Regional Program Evaluation (DGIRPE) through the Leading Industry Development for Economic Region (R0001279). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/clr.12720",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "1187--1192",

journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",

issn = "0905-7161",

publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant hard and soft tissues

T2 - an animal study

AU - Choi, Jay Yong

AU - Moon, Ik Sang

AU - Yun, Jeong Ho

AU - Park, Kwang Ho

AU - Huh, Jong Ki

AU - Lee, Dong Won

N1 - Funding Information: We thank Dr. Kwang-Bum Park in Megagen Implant and Professor Sung-Soo Kang in Chun Nam University for supporting us the animal experiments. This research was financially supported by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) and Dae Gyeong Institute for Regional Program Evaluation (DGIRPE) through the Leading Industry Development for Economic Region (R0001279). Publisher Copyright: © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this animal study was to examine the effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant tissues in terms of BIC and hard- and soft-tissue dimensions. Materials and methods: Six Beagle dogs received experimental implants in the mandible 3 month after the removal of premolars and first molars (P2, P3, P4, and M1). Two different types of implants were installed in each animal: Anyone microthread® as Group 1 and Anyone® as Group 2. Resonance frequency test, intraoral radiography, micro-CT, and histomorphometry were used to evaluate peri-implant tissue after implantation periods of 4 and 8 weeks. Results: No remarkable complication was observed during the healing period in either group. Resonance frequency testing revealed no significant difference between groups. In radiographic evaluation, Group 2 showed more bone loss than Group 1. However, this difference was not statistically significant. In the micro-CT analysis, BIC and BIV values and soft-tissue height were not significant in both groups. Histological analysis revealed no significant difference in BIC ratio, bone density, or bone loss between groups. However, soft-tissue height was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.0004). Conclusion: No difference in peri-implant hard or soft tissues was observed according to thread size in the implant neck area.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this animal study was to examine the effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant tissues in terms of BIC and hard- and soft-tissue dimensions. Materials and methods: Six Beagle dogs received experimental implants in the mandible 3 month after the removal of premolars and first molars (P2, P3, P4, and M1). Two different types of implants were installed in each animal: Anyone microthread® as Group 1 and Anyone® as Group 2. Resonance frequency test, intraoral radiography, micro-CT, and histomorphometry were used to evaluate peri-implant tissue after implantation periods of 4 and 8 weeks. Results: No remarkable complication was observed during the healing period in either group. Resonance frequency testing revealed no significant difference between groups. In radiographic evaluation, Group 2 showed more bone loss than Group 1. However, this difference was not statistically significant. In the micro-CT analysis, BIC and BIV values and soft-tissue height were not significant in both groups. Histological analysis revealed no significant difference in BIC ratio, bone density, or bone loss between groups. However, soft-tissue height was significantly greater in Group 2 than in Group 1 (P = 0.0004). Conclusion: No difference in peri-implant hard or soft tissues was observed according to thread size in the implant neck area.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027946413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027946413&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/clr.12720

DO - 10.1111/clr.12720

M3 - Article

C2 - 26498561

AN - SCOPUS:85027946413

SN - 0905-7161

VL - 27

SP - 1187

EP - 1192

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

IS - 9

ER -

Effects of thread size in the implant neck area on peri-implant hard and soft tissues: an animal study

Abstract

Bibliographical note

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this