TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of groove sealing of the posterior occlusal surface and offset of the internal surface on the internal fit and accuracy of implant placements using 3d-printed surgical guides
T2 - An in vitro study
AU - Lim, Jung Hwa
AU - Bayarsaikhan, Enkhjargal
AU - Shin, Seung Ho
AU - Nam, Na Eun
AU - Shim, June Sung
AU - Kim, Jong Eun
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/4/2
Y1 - 2021/4/2
N2 - This study evaluated the internal fit and the accuracy of the implant placement position in order to determine how the surface shape of the tooth and the offset influence the accuracy of the surgical guide. The acquired digital data were analyzed in three dimensions using 3D inspec-tion software. The obtained results confirmed that the internal fit was better in the groove sealing (GS) group (164.45 ± 28.34 µm) than the original shape (OS) group (204.07 ± 44.60 µm) (p < 0.001), and for an offset of 100 µm (157.50 ± 17.26 µm) than for offsets of 30 µm (206.48 ± 39.12 µm) and 60 µm (188.82 ± 48.77 µm) (p < 0.001). The accuracy of implant placement was better in the GS than OS group in terms of the entry (OS, 0.229 ± 0.092 mm; GS, 0.169 ± 0.061 mm; p < 0.001), apex (OS, 0.324 ± 0.149 mm; GS, 0.230 ± 0.124 mm; p < 0.001), and depth (OS, 0.041 ± 0.027 mm; GS, 0.025 ± 0.022 mm; p < 0.001). In addition, the entries (30 µm, 0.215 ± 0.044 mm; 60 µm, 0.172 ± 0.049 mm; 100 µm, 0.119 ± 0.050 mm; p < 0.001) were only affected by the amount of offset. These findings indicate that the accuracy of a surgical guide can be improved by directly sealing the groove of the tooth before manufacturing the surgical guide or setting the offset during the design process.
AB - This study evaluated the internal fit and the accuracy of the implant placement position in order to determine how the surface shape of the tooth and the offset influence the accuracy of the surgical guide. The acquired digital data were analyzed in three dimensions using 3D inspec-tion software. The obtained results confirmed that the internal fit was better in the groove sealing (GS) group (164.45 ± 28.34 µm) than the original shape (OS) group (204.07 ± 44.60 µm) (p < 0.001), and for an offset of 100 µm (157.50 ± 17.26 µm) than for offsets of 30 µm (206.48 ± 39.12 µm) and 60 µm (188.82 ± 48.77 µm) (p < 0.001). The accuracy of implant placement was better in the GS than OS group in terms of the entry (OS, 0.229 ± 0.092 mm; GS, 0.169 ± 0.061 mm; p < 0.001), apex (OS, 0.324 ± 0.149 mm; GS, 0.230 ± 0.124 mm; p < 0.001), and depth (OS, 0.041 ± 0.027 mm; GS, 0.025 ± 0.022 mm; p < 0.001). In addition, the entries (30 µm, 0.215 ± 0.044 mm; 60 µm, 0.172 ± 0.049 mm; 100 µm, 0.119 ± 0.050 mm; p < 0.001) were only affected by the amount of offset. These findings indicate that the accuracy of a surgical guide can be improved by directly sealing the groove of the tooth before manufacturing the surgical guide or setting the offset during the design process.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104664913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104664913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/polym13081236
DO - 10.3390/polym13081236
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104664913
SN - 2073-4360
VL - 13
JO - Polymers
JF - Polymers
IS - 8
M1 - 1236
ER -