Abstract
The Hong and Page ‘diversity trumps ability’ result has been used to argue for the more general claim that a diverse set of agents is epistemically superior to a comparable group of experts. Here we extend Hong and Page’s model to landscapes of different degrees of randomness and demonstrate the sensitivity of the ‘diversity trumps ability’ result. This analysis offers a more nuanced picture of how diversity, ability, and expertise may relate. Although models of this sort can indeed be suggestive for diversity policies, we advise against interpreting such results overly broadly.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 98-123 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Journal | Philosophy of Science |
Volume | 86 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 Jan 1 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2019 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved.
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- History
- Philosophy
- History and Philosophy of Science