Differential genetic diagnoses of adult post-lingual hearing loss according to the audiogram pattern and novel candidate gene evaluation

John Hoon Rim, Byunghwa Noh, Young Ik Koh, Sun Young Joo, Kyung Seok Oh, Kyumin Kim, Jung Ah Kim, Da Hye Kim, Hye Youn Kim, Jee Eun Yoo, Seung Tae Lee, Jin Woong Bok, Min Goo Lee, Jinsei Jung, Jae Young Choi, Heon Yung Gee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ski-slope hearing loss (HL), which refers to increased auditory threshold at high frequencies, is common in adults. However, genetic contributions to this post-lingual HL remain largely unknown. Here, we prospectively investigated deafness-associated and novel candidate genes causing ski-slope HL. We analyzed 192 families with post-lingual HL via gene panel and/or exome sequencing. With an overall molecular diagnostic rate of 35.4% (68/192) in post-lingual HL, ski-slope HL showed a lower diagnostic rate (30.7%) compared with other conditions (40.7%). In patients who showed HL onset before the age of 40, genetic diagnostic probability was significantly lower for ski-slope HL than for other conditions. Further analysis of 51 genetically undiagnosed patients in the ski-slope HL group identified three variants in delta-like ligand 1 (DLL1), a Notch ligand, which presented in vitro gain-of-function effects on Notch downstream signaling. In conclusion, genetic diagnostic rates in post-lingual HL varied according to audiogram patterns with age-of-onset as a confounding factor. DLL1 was identified as a candidate gene causing ski-slope HL.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)915-927
Number of pages13
JournalHuman Genetics
Volume141
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022 Apr

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differential genetic diagnoses of adult post-lingual hearing loss according to the audiogram pattern and novel candidate gene evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this