TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnosis
T2 - History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle
AU - the International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle
AU - van Bergen, Christiaan J.A.
AU - Baur, Onno L.
AU - Murawski, Christopher D.
AU - Spennacchio, Pietro
AU - Carreira, Dominic S.
AU - Kearns, Stephen R.
AU - Mitchell, Adam W.
AU - Pereira, Helder
AU - Pearce, Christopher J.
AU - Calder, James D.F.
AU - Ackermann, Jakob
AU - Adams, Samuel B.
AU - Andrews, Carol L.
AU - Angthong, Chayanin
AU - Batista, Jorge P.
AU - Bayer, Steve
AU - Becher, Christoph
AU - Berlet, Gregory C.
AU - Boakye, Lorraine A.T.
AU - Brown, Alexandra J.
AU - Buda, Roberto
AU - Canata, Gian Luigi
AU - Clanton, Thomas O.
AU - Dahmen, Jari
AU - D’Hooghe, Pieter
AU - DiGiovanni, Christopher W.
AU - Dombrowski, Malcolm E.
AU - Drakos, Mark C.
AU - Ferkel, Richard D.
AU - Ferrao, Paulo N.F.
AU - Fortier, Lisa A.
AU - Glazebrook, Mark
AU - Giza, Eric
AU - Gomaa, Mohamed
AU - Görtz, Simon
AU - Haleem, Amgad M.
AU - Hamid, Kamran
AU - Hangody, Laszlo
AU - Hannon, Charles P.
AU - Haverkamp, Daniel
AU - Hertel, Jay
AU - Hintermann, Beat
AU - Hogan, Ma Calus V.
AU - Hunt, Kenneth J.
AU - Hurley, Eoghan T.
AU - Karlsson, Jón
AU - Kennedy, John G.
AU - Kerkhoffs, Gino M.M.J.
AU - Kim, Hak Jun
AU - Lee, Jin Woo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Diagnosis: History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus: 51 - 74%; strong consensus: 75 - 99%; unanimous: 100%. Results: A total of 12 statements on the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Two achieved unanimous support and 10 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 86% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians in the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle.
AB - Background: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on “Diagnosis: History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Arthroscopy” developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Methods: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus: 51 - 74%; strong consensus: 75 - 99%; unanimous: 100%. Results: A total of 12 statements on the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Two achieved unanimous support and 10 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement). All statements reached at least 86% agreement. Conclusions: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians in the diagnosis of cartilage injuries of the ankle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049885973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049885973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1071100718779393
DO - 10.1177/1071100718779393
M3 - Article
C2 - 30215306
AN - SCOPUS:85049885973
SN - 1071-1007
VL - 39
SP - 3S-8S
JO - Foot and Ankle International
JF - Foot and Ankle International
IS - 1_suppl
ER -