Dacomitinib compared with placebo in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NCIC CTG BR.26): A double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial

Peter M. Ellis, Frances A. Shepherd, Michael Millward, Francesco Perrone, Lesley Seymour, Geoffrey Liu, Sophie Sun, Byoung Chul Cho, Alessandro Morabito, Natasha B. Leighl, Martin R. Stockler, Christopher W. Lee, Rafal Wierzbicki, Victor Cohen, Normand Blais, Randeep S. Sangha, Adolfo G. Favaretto, Jin Hyoung Kang, Ming Sound Tsao, Carolyn F. WilsonZelanna Goldberg, Keyue Ding, Glenwood D. Goss, Penelope Ann Bradbury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

116 Citations (Scopus)


Background: Dacomitinib is an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine-kinase inhibitor with preclinical and clinical evidence of activity in non-small-cell lung cancer. We designed BR.26 to assess whether dacomitinib improved overall survival in heavily pretreated patients with this disease. Methods: In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer from 75 centres in 12 countries. Eligible patients had received up to three previous lines of chemotherapy and either gefitinib or erlotinib, and had assessable disease (RECIST 1.1) and tumour tissue samples for translational studies. Patients were stratified according to centre, performance status, tobacco use, best response to previous EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, weight loss within the previous 3 months, and ethnicity, and were then randomly allocated 2:1 to oral dacomitinib 45 mg once-daily or matched placebo centrally via a web-based system. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcome was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population; secondary outcomes included overall survival in predefined molecular subgroups, progression-free survival, the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response, safety, and quality of life. This study is completed, although follow-up is ongoing for patients on treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01000025. Findings: Between Dec 23, 2009, and June 11, 2013, we randomly assigned 480 patients to dacomitinib and 240 patients to placebo. At the final analysis (January, 2014), median follow-up was 23·4 months (IQR 15·6-29·6) for patients in the dacomitinib group and 24·4 months (11·5-38·9) for those in the placebo group. Dacomitinib did not improve overall survival compared with placebo (median 6·83 months [95% CI 6·08-7·49] for dacomitinib vs 6·31 months [5·32-7·52] for placebo; hazard ratio [HR] 1·00 [95% CI 0·83-1·21]; p=0·506). However, patients in the dacomitinib group had longer progression-free survival than those in the placebo group (median 2·66 months [1·91-3·32] vs 1·38 months [0·99-1·74], respectively; HR 0·66 [95% CI 0·55-0·79]; p<0·0001), and a significantly greater proportion of patients in the dacomitinb group achieved an objective response than in the placebo group (34 [7%] of 480 patients vs three [1%] of 240 patients, respectively; p=0·001). Compared with placebo, the effect of dacomitinib on overall survival seemed similar in patients with EGFR-mutation-positive tumours (HR 0·98, 95% CI 0·67-1·44) and EGFR wild-type tumours (0·93, 0·71-1·21; pinteraction=0·69). However, we noted qualitative differences in the effect of dacomitinib on overall survival for patients with KRAS-mutation-positive tumours (2·10, 1·05-4·22) and patients with KRAS wild-type tumours (0·79, 0·61-1·03; pinteraction=0·08). Compared with placebo, patients allocated dacomitinib had significantly longer time to deterioration of cough (p<0·0001), dyspnoea (p=0·049), and pain (p=0·041). 185 (39%) of 477 patients who received dacomitinib and 86 (36%) of 239 patients who received placebo had serious adverse events. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were diarrhoea (59 [12%] patients on dacomitinib vs no controls), acneiform rash (48 [10%] vs one [<1%]), oral mucositis (16 [3%] vs none), and fatigue (13 [3%] vs four [2%]). Interpretation: Dacomitinib did not increase overall survival and cannot be recommended for treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy and an EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. Funding: Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute and Pfizer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1379-1388
Number of pages10
JournalThe Lancet Oncology
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Nov 1

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
PME declares honoraria from Pfizer (from 2010), Roche, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. FAS declares honoraria from Roche. GL declares honoraria from Pfizer and Novartis. AM declares honoraria from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Roche. NB declares honoraria from Pfizer. RSS declares honoraria from AsreaZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Roche. M-ST declares honoraria from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, and Novartis. ZG is a Pfizer employee. GDG reports honoraria from Roche. PAB is funded by a Cancer Care Ontario Research Chair in Experimental Therapeutics. MM, FP, LS, SS, BCC, NBL, MRS, CWL, RW, VC, AGF, JHK, CFW, and KD declare no competing interests.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology


Dive into the research topics of 'Dacomitinib compared with placebo in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NCIC CTG BR.26): A double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this