Cultural governance: A comparative study of three cultural districts

M. Jae Moon

doi:10.1177/0095399701334003

Cultural governance: A comparative study of three cultural districts

M. Jae Moon

Department of Public Administration

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews the concept of cultural governance. Three cases of cultural governance are examined including the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District (SCFD) in Colorado, the Metropolitan Zoological Parkand Museum District (MZPMD) in Missouri, and the Allegheny Regional Asset District (ARAD) in Pennsylvania. This study shows that cultural governance has emerged as an innovative and effective institutional and financial arrangement that supports local and regional cultural activities. It also suggests that the successful performance of cultural governance relies on strategic coalitions behveen cultural stakeholders, healthy city-county partnerships, and stable funding mechanisms.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	432-454
Number of pages	23
Journal	Administration and Society
Volume	33
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399701334003
Publication status	Published - 2001

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Sociology and Political Science
Public Administration
Marketing

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/0095399701334003

Cite this

@article{51ebed1ab4ff45a39defc9a405c066fd,

title = "Cultural governance: A comparative study of three cultural districts",

abstract = "This article reviews the concept of cultural governance. Three cases of cultural governance are examined including the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District (SCFD) in Colorado, the Metropolitan Zoological Parkand Museum District (MZPMD) in Missouri, and the Allegheny Regional Asset District (ARAD) in Pennsylvania. This study shows that cultural governance has emerged as an innovative and effective institutional and financial arrangement that supports local and regional cultural activities. It also suggests that the successful performance of cultural governance relies on strategic coalitions behveen cultural stakeholders, healthy city-county partnerships, and stable funding mechanisms.",

author = "Moon, {M. Jae}",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1177/0095399701334003",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "432--454",

journal = "Administration and Society",

issn = "0095-3997",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cultural governance

T2 - A comparative study of three cultural districts

AU - Moon, M. Jae

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - This article reviews the concept of cultural governance. Three cases of cultural governance are examined including the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District (SCFD) in Colorado, the Metropolitan Zoological Parkand Museum District (MZPMD) in Missouri, and the Allegheny Regional Asset District (ARAD) in Pennsylvania. This study shows that cultural governance has emerged as an innovative and effective institutional and financial arrangement that supports local and regional cultural activities. It also suggests that the successful performance of cultural governance relies on strategic coalitions behveen cultural stakeholders, healthy city-county partnerships, and stable funding mechanisms.

AB - This article reviews the concept of cultural governance. Three cases of cultural governance are examined including the Scientific and Cultural Facilities District (SCFD) in Colorado, the Metropolitan Zoological Parkand Museum District (MZPMD) in Missouri, and the Allegheny Regional Asset District (ARAD) in Pennsylvania. This study shows that cultural governance has emerged as an innovative and effective institutional and financial arrangement that supports local and regional cultural activities. It also suggests that the successful performance of cultural governance relies on strategic coalitions behveen cultural stakeholders, healthy city-county partnerships, and stable funding mechanisms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749193475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749193475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0095399701334003

DO - 10.1177/0095399701334003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33749193475

SN - 0095-3997

VL - 33

SP - 432

EP - 454

JO - Administration and Society

JF - Administration and Society

IS - 4

ER -

Cultural governance: A comparative study of three cultural districts

Abstract

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this