Abstract
The present study investigated whether computation of mean object size was based on perceived or physical size. The Ebbinghaus illusion was used to make the perceived size of a circle different from its physical size. Four Ebbinghaus configurations were presented either simultaneously (Experiment 1) or sequentially (Experiment 2) to each visual field, and participants were instructed to attend only to the central circles of each configuration. Participants' judgments of mean central circle size were influenced by the Ebbinghaus illusion. In addition, the Ebbinghaus illusion influenced the coding of individual size rather than the averaging. These results suggest that perceived rather than physical size was used in computing the mean size.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 375-384 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics |
Volume | 71 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2009 Feb |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by Korea Research Foundation Grant KRF-2006-332-H00039, funded by the Korean Government (MOEHRD).
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Language and Linguistics
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Sensory Systems
- Linguistics and Language