Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods

C. Lee; H. Choi; E. Lee; S. Lee; J. Choe

doi:10.1117/12.651056

Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods

C. Lee, H. Choi, E. Lee, S. Lee, J. Choe

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we present comparison of three subjective testing methods: the double stimulus continuous quality scale (DSCQS) method, the single stimulus continuous quality evaluation (SSCQE) method and the absolute category rating (ACR) method. The DSCQS method was used for validate objective models in the VQEG Phase II FRTV test. The SSCQE method is chosen to be used in the VQEG RRTV test. The ACR method is chosen to be used in the VQEG Multimedia test. Since a different subjective test method is used in each test, analyses of the three methods will provide helpful information in understanding human perception of video quality.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Image Quality and System Performance III - Proceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1117/12.651056
Publication status	Published - 2006
Event	Image Quality and System Performance III - San Jose, CA, United States Duration: 2006 Jan 17 → 2006 Jan 19

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
Volume	6059
ISSN (Print)	0277-786X

Other

Other	Image Quality and System Performance III
Country/Territory	United States
City	San Jose, CA
Period	06/1/17 → 06/1/19

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Condensed Matter Physics
Computer Science Applications
Applied Mathematics
Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Access to Document

10.1117/12.651056

Cite this

@inproceedings{d783fe529105498e99fb131190268d41,

title = "Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods",

abstract = "In this paper, we present comparison of three subjective testing methods: the double stimulus continuous quality scale (DSCQS) method, the single stimulus continuous quality evaluation (SSCQE) method and the absolute category rating (ACR) method. The DSCQS method was used for validate objective models in the VQEG Phase II FRTV test. The SSCQE method is chosen to be used in the VQEG RRTV test. The ACR method is chosen to be used in the VQEG Multimedia test. Since a different subjective test method is used in each test, analyses of the three methods will provide helpful information in understanding human perception of video quality.",

author = "C. Lee and H. Choi and E. Lee and S. Lee and J. Choe",

year = "2006",

doi = "10.1117/12.651056",

language = "English",

isbn = "0819460990",

series = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",

booktitle = "Image Quality and System Performance III - Proceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging",

note = "Image Quality and System Performance III ; Conference date: 17-01-2006 Through 19-01-2006",

}

Lee, C, Choi, H, Lee, E, Lee, S & Choe, J 2006, Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods. in Image Quality and System Performance III - Proceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging., 605906, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 6059, Image Quality and System Performance III, San Jose, CA, United States, 06/1/17. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.651056

Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods. / Lee, C.; Choi, H.; Lee, E. et al.
Image Quality and System Performance III - Proceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging. 2006. 605906 (Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering; Vol. 6059).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods

AU - Lee, C.

AU - Choi, H.

AU - Lee, E.

AU - Lee, S.

AU - Choe, J.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - In this paper, we present comparison of three subjective testing methods: the double stimulus continuous quality scale (DSCQS) method, the single stimulus continuous quality evaluation (SSCQE) method and the absolute category rating (ACR) method. The DSCQS method was used for validate objective models in the VQEG Phase II FRTV test. The SSCQE method is chosen to be used in the VQEG RRTV test. The ACR method is chosen to be used in the VQEG Multimedia test. Since a different subjective test method is used in each test, analyses of the three methods will provide helpful information in understanding human perception of video quality.

AB - In this paper, we present comparison of three subjective testing methods: the double stimulus continuous quality scale (DSCQS) method, the single stimulus continuous quality evaluation (SSCQE) method and the absolute category rating (ACR) method. The DSCQS method was used for validate objective models in the VQEG Phase II FRTV test. The SSCQE method is chosen to be used in the VQEG RRTV test. The ACR method is chosen to be used in the VQEG Multimedia test. Since a different subjective test method is used in each test, analyses of the three methods will provide helpful information in understanding human perception of video quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645513276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645513276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.651056

DO - 10.1117/12.651056

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:33645513276

SN - 0819460990

SN - 9780819460998

T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

BT - Image Quality and System Performance III - Proceedings of SPIE-IS and T Electronic Imaging

T2 - Image Quality and System Performance III

Y2 - 17 January 2006 through 19 January 2006

ER -

Comparison of various subjective video quality assessment methods

Abstract

Publication series

Other

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this