TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of First- A nd Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Prediabetes Based on the Hemoglobin A1c Level
AU - Kim, Yong Hoon
AU - Her, Ae Young
AU - Jeong, Myung Ho
AU - Kim, Byeong Keuk
AU - Hong, Sung Jin
AU - Kim, Seunghwan
AU - Ahn, Chul Min
AU - Kim, Jung Sun
AU - Ko, Young Guk
AU - Choi, Donghoon
AU - Hong, Myeong Ki
AU - Jang, Yangsoo
AU - Rubboli, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Yong Hoon Kim et al.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Objective. To compare major clinical outcomes after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with first-generation (1G) drug-eluting stents (DES) and second-generation (2G) DES in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prediabetes. Background. Patients with prediabetes are associated with an increased incidence of coronary artery disease. The relative superiority of 1G- A nd 2G-DES in these patients is not well established. Methods. A total of 4997 patients with AMI and prediabetes were divided into two groups: The 1D-DES group (n = 726) and the 2G-DES group (n = 4271). The primary outcomes were the patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCOs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any disease revascularization at 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcome was probable or definite stent thrombosis (ST). Results. After propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis, two PSM groups (698 pairs, n = 1396, C-statistics = 0.725) were generated. The cumulative incidence rates of POCOs (hazard ratio (HR): 1.467; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.068-2.015; p=0.018), any disease revascularization (HR: 2.259; 95% CI: 1.397-3.654; p=0.001), and ST (HR: 4.361; 95% CI: 1.243-15.30; p=0.021) in the 1G-DES group were significantly higher than those in the 2G-DES group. However, the cumulative incidence rates of all-cause death, cardiac death, and Re-MI were similar between the two groups. Conclusions. In patients with AMI and prediabetes, 2G-DES implantation was more efficacious than 1G-DES implantation over a 2-year follow-up period. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.
AB - Objective. To compare major clinical outcomes after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with first-generation (1G) drug-eluting stents (DES) and second-generation (2G) DES in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prediabetes. Background. Patients with prediabetes are associated with an increased incidence of coronary artery disease. The relative superiority of 1G- A nd 2G-DES in these patients is not well established. Methods. A total of 4997 patients with AMI and prediabetes were divided into two groups: The 1D-DES group (n = 726) and the 2G-DES group (n = 4271). The primary outcomes were the patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCOs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any disease revascularization at 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcome was probable or definite stent thrombosis (ST). Results. After propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis, two PSM groups (698 pairs, n = 1396, C-statistics = 0.725) were generated. The cumulative incidence rates of POCOs (hazard ratio (HR): 1.467; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.068-2.015; p=0.018), any disease revascularization (HR: 2.259; 95% CI: 1.397-3.654; p=0.001), and ST (HR: 4.361; 95% CI: 1.243-15.30; p=0.021) in the 1G-DES group were significantly higher than those in the 2G-DES group. However, the cumulative incidence rates of all-cause death, cardiac death, and Re-MI were similar between the two groups. Conclusions. In patients with AMI and prediabetes, 2G-DES implantation was more efficacious than 1G-DES implantation over a 2-year follow-up period. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088883467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088883467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2020/1710439
DO - 10.1155/2020/1710439
M3 - Article
C2 - 32733169
AN - SCOPUS:85088883467
SN - 0896-4327
VL - 2020
JO - Journal of Interventional Cardiology
JF - Journal of Interventional Cardiology
M1 - 1710439
ER -