Comparing the efficacy of different methods of faecal microbiota transplantation via oral capsule, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, or gastric tube

E. H. Lee, S. K. Lee, J. H. Cheon, H. Koh, J. A. Lee, C. H. Kim, J. N. Kim, K. H. Lee, S. J. Lee, J. H. Kim, J. Y. Ahn, S. J. Jeong, N. S. Ku, D. E. Yong, S. S. Yoon, J. S. Yeom, J. Y. Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) carriage poses major challenges to medicine as healthcare costs increase. Recently, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been discussed as a novel and effective method for decolonizing MDRO. Aim: To compare the efficacy of different FMT methods to optimize the success rate of decolonization in patients with MDRO carriage. Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with MDRO carriages from 2018 to 2021. Patients underwent FMT via one of the following methods: oral capsule, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), colonoscopy, or gastric tube. Findings: A total of 57 patients underwent FMT for MDRO decolonization. The colonoscopy group required the shortest time for decolonization, whereas the EGD group required the longest (24.9 vs 190.4 days, P = 0.022). The decolonization rate in the oral capsule group was comparable to that in the EGD group (84.6% vs 85.7%, P = 0.730). An important clinical factor associated with decolonization failure was antibiotic use after FMT (odds ratio = 6.810, P = 0.008). All four groups showed reduced proportions of MDRO species in microbiome analysis after FMT. Conclusion: Compared to other conventional methods, the oral capsule is an effective FMT method for patients who can tolerate an oral diet. The discontinuation of antibiotics after FMT is a key factor in the success of decolonization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-243
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hospital Infection
Volume131
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023 Jan

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Severance Hospital Research Fund for Clinical Excellence (SHRC), the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded research programme (2019-ER540-00), research grants for the discovery of important clinical and epidemiological indicators for people living with HIV (Korea HIV/AIDS Cohort Study, 2019-ER5101-00), and a grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare , Republic of Korea (grant number HI14C1324).

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Severance Hospital Research Fund for Clinical Excellence (SHRC), the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded research programme (2019-ER540-00), research grants for the discovery of important clinical and epidemiological indicators for people living with HIV (Korea HIV/AIDS Cohort Study, 2019-ER5101-00), and a grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number HI14C1324).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Healthcare Infection Society

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the efficacy of different methods of faecal microbiota transplantation via oral capsule, oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, or gastric tube'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this