TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative assessment of marginal and internal gaps of cast-free monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated from 2 intraoral scanners
T2 - A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial
AU - Cho, Su Min
AU - Oh, Kyung Chul
AU - Park, Ji Man
AU - Lim, Jung Hwa
AU - Kwon, Jae Sung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Statement of problem: Despite the introduction of intraoral scanners (IOSs) with dual camera triangulation, only a few comparative clinical studies have evaluated their clinical performances in the digital workflow for cast-free restorations. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical trial was to assess the clinical efficacy of 2 different technology-based IOSs by evaluating the marginal and internal gaps of cast-free monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using a fully digital workflow. Material and methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted in 35 participants requiring a single-unit restoration. One crown was fabricated from the scan data obtained with a confocal microscopy-based IOS (Group T), while the other was made with the scan data obtained from an IOS using dual camera triangulation (Group I). A replica technique was used to assess the marginal and internal gaps. The buccolingual and mesiodistal cross-sections were measured, and noninferiority trials were performed. Results: A total of 39 teeth from 35 participants were restored with a single-unit crown. The marginal and axial wall gaps of the crowns in Group I was not inferior to that of the crowns in Group T (upper limit confidence interval [CI] <30). In contrast, the gap of the crowns at the line angle in Group T was inferior to that of the crowns in Group I (lower limit CI <−30). From an occlusal space perspective, the gap of the crowns in Group I was inferior to that of the crowns in Group T (upper limit CI >30). Twenty-five crowns were selected from Group I, and 14 crowns were selected from Group T for definitive placement. Conclusions: The marginal gap of the crown fabricated by using the scan data obtained from the dual camera triangulation-based IOS was noninferior to that obtained from the confocal microscopy-based IOS and was within the clinically applicable limit.
AB - Statement of problem: Despite the introduction of intraoral scanners (IOSs) with dual camera triangulation, only a few comparative clinical studies have evaluated their clinical performances in the digital workflow for cast-free restorations. Purpose: The purpose of this clinical trial was to assess the clinical efficacy of 2 different technology-based IOSs by evaluating the marginal and internal gaps of cast-free monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using a fully digital workflow. Material and methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted in 35 participants requiring a single-unit restoration. One crown was fabricated from the scan data obtained with a confocal microscopy-based IOS (Group T), while the other was made with the scan data obtained from an IOS using dual camera triangulation (Group I). A replica technique was used to assess the marginal and internal gaps. The buccolingual and mesiodistal cross-sections were measured, and noninferiority trials were performed. Results: A total of 39 teeth from 35 participants were restored with a single-unit crown. The marginal and axial wall gaps of the crowns in Group I was not inferior to that of the crowns in Group T (upper limit confidence interval [CI] <30). In contrast, the gap of the crowns at the line angle in Group T was inferior to that of the crowns in Group I (lower limit CI <−30). From an occlusal space perspective, the gap of the crowns in Group I was inferior to that of the crowns in Group T (upper limit CI >30). Twenty-five crowns were selected from Group I, and 14 crowns were selected from Group T for definitive placement. Conclusions: The marginal gap of the crown fabricated by using the scan data obtained from the dual camera triangulation-based IOS was noninferior to that obtained from the confocal microscopy-based IOS and was within the clinically applicable limit.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85136148525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85136148525&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.035
DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.035
M3 - Article
C2 - 35985854
AN - SCOPUS:85136148525
SN - 0022-3913
VL - 129
SP - 69
EP - 75
JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
IS - 1
ER -