TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of the misfit dislocations at the ferrite/cementite interface in pearlitic steel
T2 - An atomistic simulation study
AU - Kim, Jaemin
AU - Kang, Keonwook
AU - Ryu, Seunghwa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The characteristics of the misfit dislocations at ferrite/cementite interfaces (FCIs) for various orientation relationships (ORs) have important implications for the mechanical behavior and the phase transformation of pearlitic steels; however, the detailed characteristics of these misfit dislocations have not been thoroughly elucidated to date. Using the extended atomically informed Frank-Bilby (xAIFB) method and atomistic simulation, we characterized the structures of misfit dislocations and calculated the interface energies of five ORs (Bagaryatsky, Isaichev, Pitsch-Petch, Near Bagaryatsky and Near Pitsch-Petch), respectively. Atomistic calculations of the interface energies of five ORs reveal that (1) the Isaichev OR has the lowest interface formation energy and (2) Near Bagaryatsky and Near Pitsch-Petch ORs are energetically more favorable than exact Bagaryatsky and Pitsch-Petch ORs in spite of small misorientation angle. The interface formation energy of each OR is qualitatively well explained by the structure and spacing of FCI dislocations, which demonstrate the importance of the characterization of misfit dislocations.
AB - The characteristics of the misfit dislocations at ferrite/cementite interfaces (FCIs) for various orientation relationships (ORs) have important implications for the mechanical behavior and the phase transformation of pearlitic steels; however, the detailed characteristics of these misfit dislocations have not been thoroughly elucidated to date. Using the extended atomically informed Frank-Bilby (xAIFB) method and atomistic simulation, we characterized the structures of misfit dislocations and calculated the interface energies of five ORs (Bagaryatsky, Isaichev, Pitsch-Petch, Near Bagaryatsky and Near Pitsch-Petch), respectively. Atomistic calculations of the interface energies of five ORs reveal that (1) the Isaichev OR has the lowest interface formation energy and (2) Near Bagaryatsky and Near Pitsch-Petch ORs are energetically more favorable than exact Bagaryatsky and Pitsch-Petch ORs in spite of small misorientation angle. The interface formation energy of each OR is qualitatively well explained by the structure and spacing of FCI dislocations, which demonstrate the importance of the characterization of misfit dislocations.
KW - A. Dislocations
KW - A. Phase transformation
KW - B. Metallic material
KW - C. Characteristics
KW - Pearlitic steel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969509020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969509020&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.04.016
DO - 10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.04.016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84969509020
SN - 0749-6419
VL - 83
SP - 302
EP - 312
JO - International Journal of Plasticity
JF - International Journal of Plasticity
ER -