TY - JOUR
T1 - Central corneal thickness measurements in unoperated eyes and eyes after PRK for myopia using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry
AU - Sun, Woong Kim
AU - Yeo, Jue Byun
AU - Eung, Kweon Kim
AU - Kim, Tae Im
PY - 2007/11
Y1 - 2007/11
N2 - PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained in unoperated eyes and eyes after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), a scanning slit corneal topography system (Orbscan II), and ultrasonic pachymetry. METHODS: Corneal thickness was measured using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry in 25 unoperated eyes (unoperated group), 24 eyes 1 to 3 months after myopic PRK (early postoperative PRK group), and 21 eyes 4 months or more after myopic PRK (late postoperative PRK group). RESULTS: In the unoperated group, corneal thickness measurements were similar for all three methods (P=.125). In the early postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam and ultrasonic measurements by a mean of 69.4 μm and 63.4 μm (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively). In the late postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam measurements by a mean of 36.0 μm (P=.017). Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry measurements were similar for all three groups with a mean difference of approximately 10 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Following myopic PRK, Pentacam was comparable to ultrasonic pachymetry in measuring corneal thickness, whereas Orbscan measurements were thinner.
AB - PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained in unoperated eyes and eyes after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), a scanning slit corneal topography system (Orbscan II), and ultrasonic pachymetry. METHODS: Corneal thickness was measured using Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasonic pachymetry in 25 unoperated eyes (unoperated group), 24 eyes 1 to 3 months after myopic PRK (early postoperative PRK group), and 21 eyes 4 months or more after myopic PRK (late postoperative PRK group). RESULTS: In the unoperated group, corneal thickness measurements were similar for all three methods (P=.125). In the early postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam and ultrasonic measurements by a mean of 69.4 μm and 63.4 μm (P<.001 and P=.002, respectively). In the late postoperative PRK group, Orbscan measurements were thinner than Pentacam measurements by a mean of 36.0 μm (P=.017). Pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry measurements were similar for all three groups with a mean difference of approximately 10 μm. CONCLUSIONS: Following myopic PRK, Pentacam was comparable to ultrasonic pachymetry in measuring corneal thickness, whereas Orbscan measurements were thinner.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36448970833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36448970833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3928/1081-597x-20071101-04
DO - 10.3928/1081-597x-20071101-04
M3 - Article
C2 - 18041241
AN - SCOPUS:36448970833
SN - 1081-597X
VL - 23
SP - 888
EP - 894
JO - Journal of Refractive Surgery
JF - Journal of Refractive Surgery
IS - 9
ER -