TY - JOUR
T1 - Central blood pressure for the management of hypertension
T2 - Is it a practical clinical tool in current practice?
AU - Cheng, Hao Min
AU - Chuang, Shao Yuan
AU - Wang, Tzung Dau
AU - Kario, Kazuomi
AU - Buranakitjaroen, Peera
AU - Chia, Yook Chin
AU - Divinagracia, Romeo
AU - Hoshide, Satoshi
AU - Minh, Huynh Van
AU - Nailes, Jennifer
AU - Park, Sungha
AU - Shin, Jinho
AU - Siddique, Saulat
AU - Sison, Jorge
AU - Soenarta, Arieska Ann
AU - Sogunuru, Guru Prasad
AU - Sukonthasarn, Apichard
AU - Tay, Jam Chin
AU - Teo, Boon Wee
AU - Turana, Yuda
AU - Verma, Narsingh
AU - Zhang, Yuqing
AU - Wang, Ji Guang
AU - Chen, Chen Huan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - Since noninvasive central blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are readily available, central BP has gained growing attention regarding its clinical application in the management of hypertension. The disagreement between central and peripheral BP has long been recognized. Some previous studies showed that noninvasive central BP may be better than the conventional brachial BP in association with target organ damages and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies further suggest that the central BP strategy for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension may be more cost-effective than the conventional strategy, and guidance of hypertension management with central BP may result in less use of medications to achieve BP control. Despite the use of central BP being promising, more randomized controlled studies comparing central BP-guided therapeutic strategies with conventional care for cardiovascular events reduction are required because noninvasive central and brachial BP measures are conveniently available. In this brief review, the rationale supporting the utility of central BP in clinical practice and relating challenges are summarized.
AB - Since noninvasive central blood pressure (BP) measuring devices are readily available, central BP has gained growing attention regarding its clinical application in the management of hypertension. The disagreement between central and peripheral BP has long been recognized. Some previous studies showed that noninvasive central BP may be better than the conventional brachial BP in association with target organ damages and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Recent studies further suggest that the central BP strategy for confirming a diagnosis of hypertension may be more cost-effective than the conventional strategy, and guidance of hypertension management with central BP may result in less use of medications to achieve BP control. Despite the use of central BP being promising, more randomized controlled studies comparing central BP-guided therapeutic strategies with conventional care for cardiovascular events reduction are required because noninvasive central and brachial BP measures are conveniently available. In this brief review, the rationale supporting the utility of central BP in clinical practice and relating challenges are summarized.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076760103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076760103&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jch.13758
DO - 10.1111/jch.13758
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31841279
AN - SCOPUS:85076760103
SN - 1524-6175
VL - 22
SP - 391
EP - 406
JO - Journal of Clinical Hypertension
JF - Journal of Clinical Hypertension
IS - 3
ER -